首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry research >Encoding deficits in low-educated individuals with non-amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Analysis of memory processes using the Item Specific Deficit Approach
【24h】

Encoding deficits in low-educated individuals with non-amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Analysis of memory processes using the Item Specific Deficit Approach

机译:编码低受过教育人员的赤字,具有非Amnestic MILD认知障碍。 使用项目特定赤字方法的内存流程分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work aims to analyze encoding impairments using new assessment scores in patients with naMCI who present to memory clinics with subjective cognitive complaints. The sample included 102 participants, of whom 28 were classified as healthy controls (HC), 24 as amnestic MCI (aMCI), 24 as naMCI and 26 patients as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Research outcomes were the Encoding, Consolidation and Retrieval deficit indices from the Item Specific Deficit Approach, and traditional indices (immediate total recall, delayed cued recall, delayed total recall) derived from the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). We found no differences in immediate recall or delayed recall between HC and naMCI on the FCSRT, both scoring higher than aMCI and AD. naMCI showed encoding deficits in between HC and aMCI, with no differences between naMCI and HC on consolidation or retrieval deficit indices. The ISDA indices were better than traditional indices to discriminate between HC and naMCI (sensitivity: 70.8%, specificity: 78.6%), whereas the opposite pattern was found between naMCI and aMCI (sensitivity: 70.8%, specificity: 91.7%). New indices derived from neuropsychological tests may help to identify objective memory impairments in naMCI. Whether these new indices are useful for predicting conversion to AD needs further research.
机译:这项工作旨在分析利用NAMCI患者的新评估分数来分析编码障碍,该评估分数以主观认知投诉向记忆诊所呈现给记忆诊所。该样本包括102名参与者,其中28名被分类为健康对照(HC),24例,作为Amnestic MCI(AMCI),24例,作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的26名患者。研究结果是从项目特定赤字方法的编码,整合和检索赤字指数,以及传统指数(立即总召回,延迟Cure Recall,延迟总召回)衍生自免费和换取选择性提醒测试(FCSRT)。我们发现在FCSRT上立即召回或延迟召回的立即召回或延迟召回的差异,都是比AMCI和广告更高的评分。 NAMCI在HC和AMCI之间显示了编码缺陷,NAMCI和HC在整合或检索缺陷指数之间没有差异。 ISDA指数优于传统指数,以区分HC和Namci(敏感性:70.8%,特异性:78.6%),而NamCi和AMCI之间存在相反的模式(敏感性:70.8%,特异性:91.7%)。来自神经心理学测试的新索引可能有助于识别NAMCI中的客观记忆障碍。这些新指数是否可用于预测转换为广告需求进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号