首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry research >A comparison between the original and Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients with schizophrenia: Test-retest agreement, random measurement error, practice effect, and ecological validity
【24h】

A comparison between the original and Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients with schizophrenia: Test-retest agreement, random measurement error, practice effect, and ecological validity

机译:精神分裂症患者原始和基于片剂的符号数字模态试验的比较:测试 - 重新测试协议,随机测量误差,实践效果和生态有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to compare the test-retest agreement, random measurement error, practice effect, and ecological validity of the original and Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test (T-SDMT) over five serial assessments, and to examine the concurrent validity of the T-SDMT in patients with schizophrenia. Sixty patients with chronic schizophrenia completed five serial assessments (one week apart) of the SDMT and T-SDMT and one assessment of the Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale III at the first time point. Both measures showed high test-retest agreement, similar levels of random measurement error over five serial assessments. Moreover, the practice effects of the two measures did not reach a plateau phase after five serial assessments in young and middle-aged participants. Nevertheless, only the practice effect of the T-SDMT became trivial after the first assessment. Like the SDMT, the T-SDMT had good ecological validity. The T-SDMT also had good concurrent validity with the SDMT. In addition, only the T-SDMT had discriminative validity to discriminate processing speed in young and middle-aged participants. Compared to the SDMT, the T-SDMT had overall slightly better psychometric properties, so it can be an alternative measure to the SDMT for assessing processing speed in patients with schizophrenia.
机译:我们的目标是在五个序列评估中比较原始和基于平板电脑的符号数字模态测试(T-SDMT)的测试重新测试,随机测量误差,实践效果和生态有效性,并检查T的并发有效性-SDMT在精神分裂症患者中。六十患者慢性精神分裂症患者完成了五个序列评估(一周分开)SDMT和T-SDMT,并在第一次评估日常生活评级规模III的活动。这两种措施都显示出高的测试重新测试协议,五种序列评估中的随机测量误差等级。此外,两种措施的实践效果在年轻和中年参与者的五次序列评估后没有达到平台阶段。然而,在第一次评估后,只有T-SDMT的实践效果变得微不足道。像SDMT一样,T-SDMT具有良好的生态有效性。 T-SDMT也与SDMT具有良好的并发有效性。此外,只有T-SDMT才有鉴别性有效性,以区分年轻和中年参与者的处理速度。与SDMT相比,T-SDMT的心理测量性能略微更好,因此可以是SDMT的替代测量,用于评估精神分裂症患者的处理速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号