...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Negotiating “Unmeasurable Harm and Benefit”: Perspectives of General Practitioners and Consultant Pharmacists on Deprescribing in the Primary Care Setting
【24h】

Negotiating “Unmeasurable Harm and Benefit”: Perspectives of General Practitioners and Consultant Pharmacists on Deprescribing in the Primary Care Setting

机译:谈判“不可估量的伤害和福利”:普通从业者和顾问药剂师在初级保健环境中贬低的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The use of multiple medicines, known as polypharmacy, poses a risk of harm that is greatest in older adults with multimorbidity. Deprescribing aims to improve health outcomes through ceasing medicines that are no longer necessary or appropriate due to changing clinical circumstances and patient priorities. General practitioners (GPs) and consultant pharmacists (CPs) are well positioned to facilitate deprescribing in primary care in partnership with older adults who present with inappropriate polypharmacy. In this article, we explore GPs’ and CPs’ views about inappropriate polypharmacy, the reasoning they apply to deprescribing in primary care, and identify factors that support or inhibit this process. Using focus group methodology and the Framework Method for thematic analysis, two major themes were discerned from the data—working through uncertainty and risk perception as a frame of reference. The findings provide important insights when devising methods for advancing and supporting deprescribing in primary care.
机译:使用多种药物,称为PolyPharcacy,造成伤害风险,这些伤害是多重成年人的多重成人。由于不断变化的临床环境和患者优先事项,通过停止药物,剥夺症旨在通过不再需要或适当的药物来改善健康结果。一般从业者(GPS)和顾问药剂师(CPS)都有很好的定位,以促进初级保健伪造与呈现不适当的复数的老年人的伪造。在本文中,我们探讨了GPS的“和CPS”观点关于不适当的PolyPharmacy,它们在初级保健中剥夺贬低的推理,并确定支持或抑制这一过程的因素。使用焦点组方法和主题分析的框架方法,通过不确定性和风险感知作为参考框架来探测两个主要主题。在设计推进和支持初级保健中的贬低时,调查结果提供了重要的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号