...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopharmacology >Potentiation of morphine-induced antinociception by harmaline: involvement of mu-opioid and ventral tegmental area NMDA receptors
【24h】

Potentiation of morphine-induced antinociception by harmaline: involvement of mu-opioid and ventral tegmental area NMDA receptors

机译:用口干管的吗啡诱导的抗闭虫的增强:穆阿片类药物和腹侧腹膜区域NMDA受体的累积

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rational Morphine is one of the most well-known and potent analgesic agents; however, it can also induce various side effects. Thus, finding drugs and mechanisms which can potentiate the analgesic effects of low doses of morphine will be a good strategy for pain management. Objective The involvement of mu-opioid receptors and ventral tegmental area (VTA) glutamatergic system in harmaline and morphine combination on the nociceptive response were investigated. Also, we examined reward efficacy and tolerance expression following the drugs. Methods Animals were bilaterally cannulated in the VTA by stereotaxic instrument. A tail-flick (TF) apparatus and conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm were used to measure nociceptive response and rewarding effects in male NMRI mice respectively. Results Morphine (2 mg/kg, i.p.) had no effect in TF test. Also, harmaline (1.25 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) could not change pain threshold. Combination of a non-effective dose of harmaline (5 mg/kg) and morphine (2 mg/kg) produced antinociception and also prevented morphine tolerance but had no effect on the acquisition of CPP. Systemic administration of naloxone (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) and intra-VTA microinjection of NMDA (0.06 and 0.1 mu g/mouse) before harmaline (5 mg/kg) plus morphine (2 mg/kg) prevented antinociception induced by the drugs. D-AP5 (0.5 and 1 mu g/mouse, intra-VTA) potentiated the effect of low-dose harmaline (1.25 mg/kg) and morphine (2 mg/kg) and induced antinociception. Microinjection of the same doses of NMDA or D-AP5 into the VTA alone had no effect on pain threshold. Conclusion The findings showed that harmaline potentiated the analgesic effect of morphine and reduced morphine tolerance. Glutamatergic and mu-opioidergic system interactions in the VTA seem to have a modulatory role in harmaline plus morphine-induced analgesia.
机译:理性吗啡是最着名和最有效的镇痛药之一;但是,它也可以诱导各种副作用。因此,寻找可以提高低剂量吗啡的镇痛作用的药物和机制将是疼痛管理的良好策略。目的研究了穆阿片类受体和腹侧特性区域(VTA)谷氨酸区(VTA)谷氨酸体系对伤害反应对伤害反应的影响。此外,我们审查了药物后的奖励疗效和耐受性表达。方法通过立体仪器在VTA中双侧插管。用于分别测量雄性NMRI小鼠中的尾部轻弹(TF)设备和条件偏好(CPP)范式。结果吗啡(2mg / kg,i.p.)对TF试验没有影响。此外,口干细胞(1.25和5mg / kg,i.p.)无法改变疼痛阈值。非有效剂量的口干管(5mg / kg)和吗啡(2mg / kg)的组合产生了抗妇科(2 mg / kg),并且还预防了吗啡耐受,但对收购CPP没有影响。纳洛酮(0.5和1mg / kg)的全身施用NMDA(0.06和0.1μg/小鼠)的鼻内(5mg / kg)加吗啡(2mg / kg)预防药物诱导的抗胰腺炎。 D-AP5(0.5和1μg/小鼠,VTA内部)强调了低剂量口干(1.25mg / kg)和吗啡(2mg / kg)和诱导的抗妇生的影响。单独将相同剂量的NMDA或D-AP5的显微注射对VTA没有对疼痛阈值的影响。结论调查结果表明,Hymaline强调了吗啡的镇痛作用,并降低了吗啡耐受性。 VTA中的谷氨酸和MU-甲蛋白剂系统相互作用似乎在口干碱基加仑诱导的镇痛中具有调节作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号