...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopathology >Assessment of Capacity Impairment in Patients with Mental Disorders by Routine Clinical Assessment and by Structured Assessment with the Mini-ICF-APP
【24h】

Assessment of Capacity Impairment in Patients with Mental Disorders by Routine Clinical Assessment and by Structured Assessment with the Mini-ICF-APP

机译:常规临床评估和Mini-ICF应用程序对精神障碍患者能力障碍的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Physicians and therapists are also consulted to give judgments on working ability. Ability to work cannot simply be derived from the patient's symptom status but from the illness-related capacity impairments in relation to the work demands. A structured assessment of capacity impairments has been evaluated and applied internationally: the Mini-ICF-APP Social Functioning Scale. It is currently unclear whether a free-text clinical report (i.e., usual clinical practice: clinical exploration according to clinical standards, but without a standardized documentation form, instead a text is written) and a structured capacity assessment correspond to the overall work ability judgment, i.e., the decision whether a patient is "fit for work" or "unfit for work." Objectives: This investigation assessed, for the first time, whether usual clinical judgment and the additional structured capacity rating support the work ability decision. Methods: A total of 100 medical reports from patients in a psychotherapy hospital were excerpted for psychopathological symptoms and capacity disorders using a checklist. Additionally, a structured assessment of capacity disorders was documented on the Mini-ICF-APP rating for all patients. Results: In the free-text clinical medical report, endurance, flexibility, and contacts to others were the things mainly reported as impaired. This was similar to the structured Mini-ICF-APP rating. However, other capacity impairments were also reported in the Mini-ICF-APP, i.e., adherence to rules and regulations, planning and structuring, assertiveness, and group integration. When the free-text clinical report and the structured Mini-ICF-APP rating were compared, there was a higher rate of stated impairments covering all capacity dimensions in the Mini-ICF-APP rating. Conclusions: The free-text report in the medical report shows the differences between patients who are fit for work and those who are not, and thus speak for the validity of work ability decisions. However, optimization is possible in terms of depth and differentiation of capacity impairment description by adhering to the standard set by the Mini-ICF-APP.
机译:背景:医生和治疗师也被咨询,以判断劳动能力。工作能力不能简单地源于患者的症状状态,而是从与工作需求相关的疾病相关的产能障碍。已经在国际上进行了评估和应用了对产能障碍的结构化评估:迷你ICF应用社会运作规模。目前目前不清楚自由文本临床报告(即,通常的临床实践:根据临床标准,但没有标准化的文件表格,而不是书面的临床勘探,而不是书面),并且结构化能力评估对应于整体工作能力判断,即,决定患者是否“适合工作”或“不适合工作”。目的:这项调查首次评估是否常见的临床判断和额外的结构化能力评级支持工作能力决定。方法:使用清单的精神病理症状和能力障碍,共介绍了从心理治疗医院患者的100例医疗报告。此外,对所有患者的Mini-ICF-App评级记录了对能力障碍的结构化评估。结果:在自由文本临床医疗报告中,耐力,灵活性和对他人的联系人是主要报告的障碍。这类似于结构化的迷你ICF应用评级。但是,在Mini-ICF-APP中也报告了其他能力障碍,即遵守规则和法规,规划和构建,自信和集团融合。在比较自由文本临床报告和结构化的迷你ICF应用评级时,较高的损害率较高,涵盖了迷你ICF应用等级中的所有能力尺寸。结论:医学报告中的自由文本报告显示了适合工作的患者的差异以及那些没有的人,从而争取工作能力决策的有效性。然而,通过遵守Mini-ICF应用程序的标准,可以在对容量损伤描述的深度和分化方面进行优化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号