...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Assessing Protective Factors in Treated Violent Offenders: Associations With Recidivism Reduction and Positive Community Outcomes
【24h】

Assessing Protective Factors in Treated Violent Offenders: Associations With Recidivism Reduction and Positive Community Outcomes

机译:评估治疗暴力罪犯的保护区因素:累犯减少和积极社区成果的协会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study examined the assessment of protective factors and their linkages to treatment change, institutional and community recidivism, and positive community outcomes in a high-risk treated sample of violent male offenders. Participants included 178 federally incarcerated adult male violent offenders who participated in a high-intensity violence reduction program and were followed up 10 years postrelease in the community. A collection of risk- and protective-factor measures were rated archivally at multiple time points-the Violence Risk Scale (Wong & Gordon, 1999-2003), Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (Version 2; Webster, Douglas, Eaves, & Hart, 1997), Structured Assessment of Protective Factors (SAPROF; De Vogel, De Ruiter, Bouman, & De Vries Robbe, 2009), and Protective Factors (PF) List. Measures of community and institutional recidivism and positive community outcomes were coded. Large correlations were observed between risk and protection scores, suggesting shared risk variance. The SAPROF and PF List each predicted decreased community recidivism and, to a lesser degree, decreased institutional recidivism. Positive changes in protective factors were significantly associated with reductions in violent and general community recidivism and serious institutional misconducts after controlling for baseline scores. In addition, risk and protection scores significantly predicted most positive community outcomes; improvements in protective factors were linked to an increase in positive outcomes. Protective factors are more than the inverse of risk factors and might have important benefits in violence risk assessment and treatment planning when other positive community outcomes are considered.
机译:本研究审查了对保护因素的评估及其与治疗变革,机构和界常规疾病的联系,以及在暴力男性罪犯的高风险治疗样本中的阳性社区结果。参与者包括178名联邦监禁成年男性暴力罪犯,他们参与了高强度的暴力减少计划,并在社区中跟进了10年的抚平性。在多个时间点 - 暴力风险规模(Wong&Gordon,19999-2003),历史临床风险管理-20(版本2;韦伯斯特,道格拉斯,屋檐,&哈特的历史风险规模(Wong&Gordon ,1997年),保护因子的结构性评估(Saprof; De Vogel,De Ruiter,Bouman,&de Vries Robbe,2009)和保护区因子(PF)列表。编码了社区和机构核查和积极社区结果的措施。在风险和保护分数之间观察到大相关,建议共享风险方差。 SAPROF和PF列表每次预测社区累犯减少,较小程度降低,减少了机构累犯。保护因子的阳性变化与暴力和一般社区累犯和控制基线分数后的严重机构不当行为的阳性变化显着。此外,风险和保护分数明显预测最积极的社区结果;保护因子的改善与阳性结果的增加有关。保护因素不仅仅是风险因素的反比力,当考虑其他积极的社区成果时,可能对暴力风险评估和治疗计划具有重要的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号