...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatric services: a journal of the American Psychiatric Association >Living Well: An Intervention to Improve Medical Illness Self-Management Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness
【24h】

Living Well: An Intervention to Improve Medical Illness Self-Management Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness

机译:生活良好:一种干预,以改善具有严重精神疾病的个体中的医学疾病自我管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Many adults with serious mental illness have significant medical illness burden and poor illness self-management. In this study, the authors examined Living Well, a group-based illness self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness that was cofacilitated by two providers, one of whom has lived experience with co-occurring mental health and medical conditions. Methods: Adults with serious mental illness (N=242) were randomly assigned to Living Well or an active control condition. Participants completed assessments of quality of life; health attitudes; self-management behaviors; and symptoms at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up. Emergency room use was assessed by means of chart review. Mixed-effects models examined group x time interactions on outcomes. Results: Compared with the control group, adults in Living Well had greater improvements at posttreatment in mental health-related quality of life (t=2.15, p = .032),self-management self-efficacy (t=4.10, p<.001), patient activation (t=2.08, p=.038), internal health locus of control (t=2.01, p=.045), behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.77, p=.006), and overall psychiatric symptoms (t=-2.02, p=.044); they had greater improvements at follow-up in physical activity-related self-management (t=2.55, p=.011) and relationship quality (t=-2.45, p=.015). No effects were found for emergency room use. The control group exhibited greater increases in physical health-related quality of life at posttreatment (t=-2.23, p=.026). Significant group differences in self-management self-efficacy (t=2.86,p=.004) and behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.08, p= .038) were maintained at follow-up. Conclusions: Compared with an active control group, a peer-cofacilitated illness self-management group was more effective in improving quality of life and self-management self-efficacy among adults with serious mental illness.
机译:目的:许多具有严重精神疾病的成年人具有显着的医疗疾病负担和疾病自我管理差。在这项研究中,作者审查了生活良好,这是一种基于团体的疾病,对具有两名提供商的严重精神疾病的成年人的自我管理干预,其中一个人曾居住过共同发生的心理健康和医疗条件的经验。方法:患有严重精神疾病(N = 242)的成年人被随机分配到生活良好或积极的控制条件。参与者完成了对生活质量的评估;健康态度;自我管理行为;和基线,后处理和随访的症状。通过图表审查评估了急诊室使用。混合效果模型检查了X群时间对结果的相互作用。结果:与对照组相比,生活中的成年人在心理健康相关生活质量(T = 2.15,P = .032),自我管理自我效能(T = 4.10,P <。 001),患者激活(t = 2.08,p = .038),内部健康控制轨迹(t = 2.01,p = .045),行为和认知症状管理(t = 2.77,p = .006),整体精神症状(t = -2.02,p = .044);它们在与物理活动相关的自我管理中的后续行动(T = 2.55,P = .011)和关系质量(t = -2.45,p = .015)进行了更大的改进。急诊室使用没有发现任何影响。对照组在后处理中表现出与身体健康相关的生活质量增加(T = -2.23,p = .026)。在随访时,自我管理自我效能(T = 2.86,P = .004)和行为和认知症状管理(T = 2.08,P = .038)的显着组差异。结论:与活性对照组相比,同性恋内部疾病自我管理组在提高成年人的生活质量和自我管理的自我疗效方面更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号