...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice and policy >Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder or PTSD With Comorbid Dissociative Disorders: Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Profiles
【24h】

Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder or PTSD With Comorbid Dissociative Disorders: Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Profiles

机译:术后应激障碍的解离亚型或具有合并分离障碍的PTSD:对临床谱的比较评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) introduced a dissociative subtype for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depersonalization and/or derealization symptoms. Despite high comorbidity rates between PTSD and dissociative disorders (DDs), research has not paid attention to the differentiation or overlap between the dissociative subtype of PTSD and DDs. This raises a question: To what extent do patients with dissociative PTSD differ from patients with PTSD and comorbid DDs? Method: We compared three groups of complex patients with trauma-related disorders and/or personality disorders (n = 150): a dissociative PTSD, a nondissociative PTSD, and a non-PTSD group of patients with mainly personality disorders. We used structured clinical interviews and self-administered questionnaires on dissociative symptoms and disorders, personality disorders, trauma histories, depression, anxiety, and general psychopathology. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES; >= 20) and the depersonalization/ derealization subscale of the DES were used for differentiating dissociative PTSD from nondissociative PTSD. Results: Of all patients, 33% met criteria for dissociative PTSD. More than half of the dissociative PTSD patients (54%) met criteria for one or more DDs; using the depersonalization/derealization subscale of the DES, even 66% had a comorbid DD. But also of the non-PTSD patients, 24% had a mean DES score of >= 20. There were no symptomatic differences (e.g., depression and anxiety) between dissociative PTSD with and without comorbid DDs. Conclusion: Overlap between dissociative PTSD and DD is large and we recommend replication of previous studies, using structured clinical assessment of DDs.
机译:介绍:精神障碍诊断和统计手册(美国精神病学协会,2013)介绍了针灸患者的解离亚型(PTSD)和缺乏症和/或致命症状。尽管PTSD和Disciative障碍(DDS)之间的合并率高,但研究没有注意PTSD和DDS的解离亚型之间的分化或重叠。这提出了一个问题:解离PTSD的患者在多大程度上与PTSD和合并DDS的患者不同?方法:我们将三组复杂患者与创伤相关的疾病和/或人格障碍(n = 150):分离的应激障碍,一种非专伦良神病毒患者,具有主要性格障碍的患者。我们使用结构化的临床访谈和自我管理的调查问卷对解离症状和疾病,人格障碍,创伤史,抑郁,焦虑和一般性心理病理学。分离经验量表(DES;> = 20)和DES的沉思分解/致致致动亚级用于区分来自非生素分配的PTSD的分离应激权利。结果:所有患者,33%符合分离应激障碍的标准。超过一半的分离应激障碍患者(54%)符合一个或多个DDS的标准;使用DES的置位化/致命亚峰值,甚至66%都有一个合并DD。但也是非专期终患者,24%的平均des得分> = 20.在双解毒剂与无与止症DDS之间的解离PTSD之间没有症状差异(例如,抑郁和焦虑)。结论:离防性PTSD和DD之间的重叠很大,我们建议使用对DDS的结构化临床评估来复制以前的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号