首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Studies >Do Critical Thinkers Drink Too Much Alcohol, Forget to Do Class Assignments, or Cheat on Exams? Using a Critical Thinking Measure to Predict College Students' Real-World Outcomes
【24h】

Do Critical Thinkers Drink Too Much Alcohol, Forget to Do Class Assignments, or Cheat on Exams? Using a Critical Thinking Measure to Predict College Students' Real-World Outcomes

机译:批判性思想家喝太多酒精,忘了做课程作业,或欺骗考试吗? 利用批判性思维措施来预测大学生现实世界的成果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Critical thinking is a higher-order way of reasoning composed of the skill and will to use cognitive abilities and knowledge on a daily basis. It is identified as essential by higher education institutions, corporations, and society in general. To analyze whether college students are critical thinkers in their daily lives, the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (HCTA; Halpern in Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (Measurement instrument), Schuhfried, M?dling, 2012) and the real-world outcomes inventory (RWO; Butler in Appl Cogn Psychol 26(5):721-729, 2012) were administered to 238 students. We performed a cluster analysis (K-means-constrained clustering method), and ANOVAs for each cluster solution tested to identify the most suitable clustering solution, taking the RWO inventory dimensions as dependent variables and cluster membership as an independent variable. Four separate clusters emerged, each representing a different profile related to students' everyday negative outcomes resulting from a lack of critical thinking. We performed multinomial logistic regression to examine which dimensions of the HCTA test, as well as gender, age, and disciplinary area, predicted the four singular groups of students that emerged: "Mature," "Risk-taking," "Lost in translation," and "Reflective." Results indicate that: (1) age is a relevant predictor of slackness, rashness, and health neglect, all characteristics of "Mature" students; (2) students who are particularly skilled in hypothesis testing tend to be "Risktaking," while it is less likely that students who are specifically competent in argument analysis will be in this group; (3) gender is relevant to predict "Lost in translation" students, while argument analysis is negatively related to the chances of being in this group. Our study supports the relevance of critical thinking in daily decisions and everyday outcomes.
机译:批判性思维是一种高阶的推理方式,由技能组成,将每天使用认知能力和知识。它是由高等教育机构,公司和社会的必然确定的。分析大学生是否是日常生活中的关键思想家,Halpern关键思维评估(HTA; Halpern在Halpern批判性思维评估(测量仪器),Schuhfried,M?Dling,2012)和现实世界成果库存(RWO;巴特勒在苹果Cognsyscycol 26(5):2012年721-729,2012)被管理到238名学生。我们执行了一个群集分析(K-Meansic-Constroning Clustering方法),以及测试每个群集解决方案的ANOVA,以识别最合适的聚类解决方案,以RWO清单尺寸作为从属变量和群集成员身份作为独立变量。出现了四个独立的集群,每个群集都代表与学生的日常消极结果相关的不同档案,由于缺乏批判性思考而导致。我们进行了多项式物流回归,以检查HCTA测试的哪个维度以及性别,年龄和纪律领域,预测了出现的四个奇异的学生群:“成熟”,“风险造就”“迷失在翻译中, “和”反思。“结果表明:(1)年龄是松弛,皮疹和健康忽视的相关预测因素,所有特征是“成熟”学生; (2)特别熟练的假设检测的学生往往是“冒险”,而专门在论证分析中专门竞争的学生将在这一群体中取决于这一组; (3)性别与预测“翻译”学生有关,虽然论证分析与在本集团中的机会负面负相关。我们的研究支持在日常决策和日常成果中的批判性思维的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号