...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Artificial Intelligence >Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with beta-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
【24h】

Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with beta-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

机译:用Vancomycin或达达霉素的单药治疗与β-内酰胺的组合治疗治疗甲氧西林抗葡萄球菌血液感染:回顾性队列分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. More in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data suggest that vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) combination therapy with beta-lactams (BL) improves outcomes of MRSA infections. We hypothesize that BL combination with VAN or DAP would reduce the odds of clinical failure compared to VAN or DAP monotherapy. Methods A retrospective cohort study of adult patients >= 18 years treated with VAN or DAP for MRSA BSI from 2006 to 2019 at Detroit Medical Center. Combination therapy (CT) was defined as VAN or DAP plus any BL for >= 24 h within 72 h of index culture. Monotherapy (MT) was defined as >= 72 h VAN or DAP within 72 h of index culture and no BL for >= 24 h up to 7 days following VAN/DAP initiation. Primary outcome was composite endpoint of clinical failure defined as: (1) 30-day mortality, (2) 60-day recurrence, or (3) persistent bacteremia (PB). PB was defined as bacteremia > 5 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between CT and the primary outcome. Results Overall, 597 patients were included in this analysis, 153 in the MT group and 444 in the CT group. CT was independently associated with reduced odds of clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.523; 95% confidence interval, 0.348-0.787). The composite endpoint was driven by 60-day recurrence and PB but not 30-day mortality. There were no difference in adverse events including nephrotoxicity between the two study arms. Conclusions In hospitalized adults with MRSA BSI, CT with any BL was independently associated with improved clinical outcomes and may ultimately be selected as preferred therapy.
机译:背景技术耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌(MRSA)血流感染(BSI)与高发病率和死亡率有关。更多的体外,体内和临床数据表明,Vancomycin(van)或达帕霉素(DAP)组合治疗β-内酰胺(BL)改善了MRSA感染的结果。我们假设与面包车或DAP的BL组合与面包车或DAP单药治疗相比,与面包车或DAP的结合会降低临床失败的几率。方法对成年患者的回顾性队列研究> = 18年,在底特律医疗中心的2006年至2019年对MRSA BSI进行治疗。联合治疗(CT)定义为面包车或DAP,在指数培养的72小时内为vAR> = 24小时。单药疗法(MT)定义为折射率培养72小时内的> = 72瓦或DAP,在vAN / DAP启动后= 24小时高达7天。主要结果是临床失败的综合终点,定义为:(1)30天死亡率,(2)60天复发,或(3)持续的菌血症(PB)。 PB被定义为菌血症> 5天。多变量逻辑回归用于评估CT与主要结果之间的关联。结果总体而言,597名患者纳入该分析中,MT组153例,CT组444。 CT独立相关,临床失败的几率降低(调整后的差距,0.523; 95%置信区间,0.348-0.787)。复合终点由60天复发和PB而不是30天死亡率驱动。不良事件没有差异,包括两项研究武器之间的肾毒性。结论与MRSA BSI的住院成年人,CT与任何BL的CT与改善的临床结果有关,最终可选择优选的疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号