首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Artificial Intelligence >An unpolitical republicanism? Vittorio Alfieri as a monarchomach
【24h】

An unpolitical republicanism? Vittorio Alfieri as a monarchomach

机译:一个不可党的共和主义? Vittorio Alfieri作为君主群

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Many contemporary scholars have been concerned with rethinking the fundamental features of the modern republican tradition in order to re-propose it in the current debate on the future of democracy. No place was properly reserved to Alfieri in this literature. Notwithstanding this deficiency, Alfieri definitely belongs to the Italian republican tradition and deserves more attention by historians of political ideas. The article offers some readings of crucial themes within Alfieri's two major political writings, Della tirannide and Del principe e delle lettere: the conception of liberty not merely intended as a predicate of people actions but as an existential condition against slavery, his contempt for voluntary and courtly servitude as well for people's shallowness, the rhetoric of virtue and so on. Nonetheless, as the specific and precise objectives of his political writings remain elusive, contrasting interpretations have been emerged over two centuries. The attempt to merge Machiavelli and Montesquieu, the assumption, that social conflict is functional because it sustains checks and balances assuring liberty, mainly explains such dissenting variety.
机译:许多当代学者们一直关注重新思考现代共和国传统的基本特征,以便在目前对民主未来的辩论中重新提出它。在这个文献中没有适当地保留在阿尔费利的地方。尽管有这种不足,阿尔费利肯定属于意大利共和党传统,值得更多受政治思想历史学家的关注。本文在阿尔法里的两个主要政治作品中,德拉·蒂兰德和德尔普林西比艾德雷·莱特雷斯提供了一些关键主题的读数:自由的概念不仅仅是作为人民行动的谓词,而是作为对奴隶制的存在条件,他对自愿的蔑视和宫廷的奴役以及人们的浅滩,德国的言论等等。尽管如此,由于他的政治着作的具体和精确目标仍然难以捉摸,因此已经出现了两个世纪以来的对比解释。为了合并Machiavelli和Montesquieu,这些社会冲突的尝试是职能的,因为它维持了支票和保证,保​​证自由,主要解释了这种异议品种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号