首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. Journal of mechanical engineering science >Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques
【24h】

Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

机译:内部螺旋齿轮根弯曲应力:ISO 6336:1996,ISO 6336:2006,VDI 2737:2005,AGMA,ANSYS有限元分析和应变计技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Association of German Engineers VDI 2737:2005 and the International Organisation for Standardisation ISO 6336:2006 are universally accepted analytical procedures for the analysis of internal gears. There is no official American Gear Manufacturers Association standard for internal gear stress analysis due to the validity of inscribing the Lewis parabola within internal concave profiles and the resulting errors associated with the location of maximum root bending stress. This research investigates the differences associated with using ISO 6336, VDI 2737 and an unofficial American Gear Manufacturers Association method, all of which are compared against a potentially more accurate numerical (ANSYS) method and strain gauge techniques.
机译:德国工程师VDI 2737:2005年和国际标准化组织ISO 6336:2006普遍接受了用于分析内部齿轮的分析程序。 由于在内部凹版简档内嵌入刘易斯抛物线的有效性以及与最大根弯曲应力的位置相关的所产生的误差,没有官方齿轮应力分析协会标准。 本研究调查了与使用ISO 6336,VDI 2737和非官方的美国齿轮制造商关联方法相关的差异,所有这些方法都与潜在更准确的数值(ANSYS)方法和应变仪技术进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号