首页> 外文期刊>PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation >Spasticity and Pain after Spinal Cord Injury: Impact on Daily Life and the Influence of Psychological Factors
【24h】

Spasticity and Pain after Spinal Cord Injury: Impact on Daily Life and the Influence of Psychological Factors

机译:脊髓损伤后的痉挛和疼痛:对日常生活的影响以及心理因素的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Spasticity and pain frequently co‐occur in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), yet, how these sequelae interact in daily life is unclear. Additionally, little is known about how psychological factors relate to the perception of spasticity and its impacts on daily life. Objectives (1) Characterize relationships between spasticity and chronic pain with regard to perceived severity, difficulty dealing, and life interference. (2) Determine the extent to which perceived spasticity severity and physiological, psychological, and pain‐related factors contribute to impacts of spasticity on daily life (difficulty in dealing, life interference). (3) Determine the effects of painful spasticity on aspects of chronic pain and spasticity (severity, life interference, interference with sleep, and spasm duration). Design Observational study. Setting University laboratory. Participants Twenty participants with SCI and lower extremity spasticity. Methods Measures included International SCI Pain Basic Data Set, Pain and Spasticity Inventories, Difficulty Dealing with Pain/Spasticity, SCI‐Spasticity Evaluation Tool, Connor‐Davidson Resilience and Moorong Self‐Efficacy Scales, Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic Reflexes, spasm duration, and injury‐related and demographic factors. Bivariate correlations, multiple regression analyses, and pairwise comparisons were performed. Results Spasticity and chronic pain were directly related, with respect to perceived severity, difficulty dealing, and life interference (rho?=?0.514‐0.673, P ??.05). Shorter injury duration, greater perceived spasticity severity, and greater difficulty dealing with pain explained 61% of variance in difficulty dealing with spasticity. Greater perceived spasticity severity and lower resilience explained 72% of variance in life interference of spasticity. Spasm duration was not significantly associated with perceived spasticity severity. Participants with painful spasticity had significantly greater chronic pain severity ( P ?=?.02) and sleep‐related impact of spasticity ( P ?=?.03) than participants without painful spasticity. Conclusions Perceived severity of spasticity, injury duration, ability to deal with chronic pain, resilience, and painful spasms appear to play important roles in the negative impacts of spasticity on life after SCI. Level of Evidence III.
机译:背景技术痉挛和疼痛经常与脊髓损伤(SCI)的人进行共同发生,这些后遗症如何在日常生活中均不清楚。此外,关于心理因素如何与对痉挛的感知及其对日常生活的影响有关的知之甚少。目标(1)表征痉挛与慢性疼痛之间的关系,在感知的严重程度,难度处理和生命干扰方面。 (2)确定感知痉挛性严重程度和生理,心理,疼痛相关因素的程度导致痉挛对日常生活的影响(处理难度,生命干扰)。 (3)确定痛苦痉挛对慢性疼痛和痉挛方面的影响(严重程度,生命干扰,干扰睡眠,痉挛持续时间)。设计观察研究。培养大学实验室。参与者与SCI和下肢痉挛的二十名参与者。方法措施包括国际SCI疼痛基本数据集,疼痛和痉挛性清单,难度处理疼痛/痉挛,SCI - 痉挛性评估工具,康纳 - 达维森恢复力和莫勇自我效能秤,脊髓评估工具用于痉挛反射,痉挛持续时间,痉挛持续时间,痉挛持续时间,与伤害有关和人口因子。生物相关性,多重回归分析和成对比较进行了相互作用。结果痉挛和慢性疼痛直接相关,关于感知的严重程度,难度处理和生命干扰(Rho?= 0.514-0.673,p?& 05)。较短的伤害持续时间,更高的感知痉挛性严重程度,以及处理疼痛的更大难度解释了难度处理痉挛的61%的差异。更大的感知痉挛性严重程度和更低的弹性解释了痉挛生命干扰的差异的72%。痉挛持续时间与感知痉挛性严重程度没有显着相关。痛苦痉挛的参与者具有显着更大的慢性疼痛严重程度(P?= 02)和痉挛的睡眠相关的影响(p?=Δ.03)而不是没有痛苦的痉挛。结论感知痉挛的严重程度,伤害持续时间,应对慢性疼痛,弹性和痛苦的痉挛似乎在SCI后痉挛性的负面影响中发挥重要作用。证据III水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号