...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Veterinary Medicine >Cost benefit analysis of automatic lameness detection systems in dairy herds: A dynamic programming approach
【24h】

Cost benefit analysis of automatic lameness detection systems in dairy herds: A dynamic programming approach

机译:乳制品牛群自动升压检测系统的成本效益分析:一种动态规划方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Epidemiological data establish that lameness is second only to mastitis as the dairy industry's most prevalent and costly animal welfare issue. Using an automatic lameness detection (ALD) system in which continuous, accurate detection is coupled with proper treatment, is key for reducing economic losses due to lameness. It is reasonable to assume that the cost of lameness would vary with its severity. Therefore, our first objective was to estimate the cost of different lameness severity levels as a function of milk production, lameness risk, conception probability, and treatment cost using a dynamic programming (DP) model. Our second objective was to conduct a cost benefit analysis for ALD systems which can reduce production losses through early detection and treatment of lameness, when compared to visual-detection (VD; i.e., performed by humans) systems. The default production loss parameters for the VD system used as inputs to the DP model were either sourced from the literature or were estimated based on data from a field trial. The production loss parameters for the ALD system used as inputs to the DP model were based on extrapolations of parameter values used for the VD system. The profit per present cow per year under assumed expenses and revenues decreased from $426.05 (when lameness incidence was assumed to be 0%) to $389.69 when lameness incidence was 19.5 %. Out of the 19.5 % lameness incidence in our default scenario, 9.8 % were moderate cases and 9.7 % were severe cases. Average cost of lameness was $36.36 at 19.5 % incidence. Average cost of lameness increased with increased incidence and was respectively $82.05, $195.05, and $286.87 at the low, medium, and high incidence scenarios. We used an operational framework which compared the lameness costs between the VD and ALD systems with 25 %, 50 % and 75 % net avoided costs (NAC) for the 10 year lifespan of the ALD system, at default, low, medium and high lameness incidence scenarios. The net return per cow per year from using an ALD system over a VD system was $13, at low incidence and 25 % NAC. The net return per cow per year for the ALD system was as high as $99 at high incidence and 75 % NAC. Out of 351 (3 system prices, 3 system efficiencies, 3 levels of lameness incidence and 13 different herd sizes) scenarios tested, 295 resulted in a net profit within the system lifespan of 10 years, thus justifying the investment in ALD systems.
机译:流行病学数据建立了跛足,仅次于乳房产业最普遍且昂贵的动物福利问题。使用一种自动升级检测(ALD)系统,其中连续,准确检测与适当的处理相结合,是降低由于跛足而降低经济损失的关键。假设跛足的成本会因其严重程度而变化是合理的。因此,我们的第一个目标是根据使用动态编程(DP)模型来估计作为牛奶生产,跛足风险,概念概率和治疗成本的不同跛足严重程度的成本。我们的第二个目的是对ALD系统进行成本效益分析,该系统可以通过早期检测和治疗跛足,与视觉检测(VD; I.,人类)系统相比,通过早期检测和治疗来降低产量损失。作为DP模型的输入的VD系统的默认生产损耗参数由文献提供,或者根据现场试验的数据估计。用作DP模型的输入系统的ALD系统的生产损耗参数基于用于VD系统的参数值的外推。每年在假定的费用和收入下每年的每年利润从426.05美元(当跛足发病率为0%)到389.69美元时,跛脚发病率为19.5%。在我们的违约情况下,在19.5%的跛足发病率下,9.8%是中等病例,9.7%是严重的案件。跛行的平均成本为36.36美元,收于19.5%。跛行的平均成本随着发病率的增加而增加,并且在低,中等和高发频道方案中分别为82.05美元,195.05美元和286.87美元。我们使用了一个运营框架,将VD和ALD系统之间的跛足成本与ALD系统的10年寿命避免的净成本(NAC)进行了比较了25%,50%和75%,以默认,低,中和高跛足发病情景。每年使用ALD系统在VD系统上使用ALD系统为13美元,低发病率和25%NAC。 ALD系统每牛的每牛净返回高达99美元,高发病率和75%NAC。在351人(3个系统价格,3个系统效率,3个水平的跛足发病率和13个不同的畜群)方案中测试的情景,295导致系统寿命净利润为10年,从而证明了对ALD系统的投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号