...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Sexual orientation health inequality: Evidence from Understanding Society , the UK Longitudinal Household Study
【24h】

Sexual orientation health inequality: Evidence from Understanding Society , the UK Longitudinal Household Study

机译:性取向健康不平等:来自理解社会的证据,英国纵向家庭研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Few studies from the United Kingdom have fully investigated inequalities between members of different sexual minority groups and heterosexuals over range of health outcomes. Using data from over 40,000 individuals, this study explores the health inequalities of sexual minority UK adults. We include respondents who identify as other and those who prefer not to say (PNS). Data come from wave three (2011–2012) of the nationally-representative Understanding Society , the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Sexual orientation was asked in the self-completion portion of the study. Markers of health include physical and mental functioning, minor psychological distress, self-rated health, substance use and disability. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses tested for differences in markers of health between sexual orientation groups. Overall, heterosexual respondents had the best health while bisexual respondents had the worst. Gay and lesbian respondents reported poorer health than heterosexuals, specifically with regards to mental functioning, distress and illness status. The other and PNS respondents were most similar to each other and generally experienced fewer health inequalities than gay and lesbian respondents; they were less likely to use tobacco or alcohol. In sum, sexual minorities experience health inequality. The inclusion of other and PNS respondents has not been done in other studies and shows that while they may be healthier than gay/lesbian and bisexual respondents they still experiences poorer health than heterosexuals. Health promotion interventions are needed for these other and PNS individuals, who might not participate in interventions targeted toward known sexual minority groups. Highlights ? Levels of mental health among gays and lesbians were poorer than heterosexual's. ? Bisexuals experienced the worst health compared to heterosexual respondents. ? Other and prefer not to say respondent's markers of health were comparable. ]]>
机译:摘要少数英国的少数研究在不同性少数群体成员和异性恋之间的成员之间完全调查了不平等性。本研究探讨了来自超过40,000名个人的数据,探讨了英国成年人的健康不平等。我们包括识别其他不喜欢(PNS)的受访者。数据来自英国家庭纵向研究的全国代表理解社会的第三(2011-2012)。在研究的自我完成部分中被要求进行性取向。健康标记包括身体和精神功能,轻微的心理困扰,自我评价的健康,物质使用和残疾。多种线性和逻辑回归分析对性定位群体之间健康标记的差异进行了测试。总体而言,异性恋访者具有最佳健康,而双性恋受访者则具有最糟糕的问题。同性恋者的受访者报告了较差的健康,而不是异性恋,特别是关于心理功能,痛苦和疾病状况。另一个和PNS受访者彼此最相似,通常越来越少的健康不平等比同性恋和女同性恋受访者;它们不太可能使用烟草或酒精。总而言之,性少数群体经历健康不平等。纳入其他和PNS受访者尚未在其他研究中进行,并表明他们可能与同性恋和女同性恋和双性恋的受访者更健康,而他们仍然经历较差的健康而不是异性恋。这些其他和PNS个人需要健康促进干预措施,他们可能不会参与针对已知性少数群体的干预措施。强调 ?同性恋者和女同性恋中的心理健康水平差不多。还与异性恋受访者相比,双性恋经历了最严重的健康状况。还其他,不愿意不要说答辩的健康标志是可比的。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号