...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Effect of an intervention on observed sun protection by vacationers in a randomized controlled trial at North American resorts
【24h】

Effect of an intervention on observed sun protection by vacationers in a randomized controlled trial at North American resorts

机译:南美度假村随机对照试验中休闲运动员对观察到防晒保护的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

During vacations, many individuals receive high-risk sun exposure that is associated with skin cancer. Vacationers in outdoor recreation venues (pretest n = 4347; posttest n = 3986) at warm-weather destination resorts in North America (n = 41) were enrolled in a pair-matched, group-randomized pretest-posttest controlled quasi-experimental design in 2012-14. Print, audiovisual, and online messages based on Transportation Theory and Diffusion of Innovation Theory and promoting advanced sun protection (e.g., use of clothing, hats, shade and pre-application/reapplication of sunscreen and reliable cues to high UV) were delivered through resort channels. Vacationers' sun protection practices observed by trained research staff (i.e., body coverage and shade use analyzed individually and in combined scores) did not differ by experimental condition (p > 0.05) or intervention implementation (p > 0.05). However, recreation venue moderated intervention impact. The intervention improved sun protection at waterside recreation venues (z-score composite: intervention pre = -22.74, post = -15.77; control pre = -27.24, post = -23.24) but not non-waterside venues (z-score composite: intervention pre = 20.43, post = 20.53; control pre = 22.94, post = 18.03, p < 0.01). An additional analysis showed that resorts with greater program implementation showed more improvements in sun protection by vacationers at waterside (z = score composite: high implementation pre = -25.45, post = -14.05; low implementation pre = -24.70, post = -21.40) compared to non-waterside (z-score composite: high implementation pre = 14.51, post = 19.98; low implementation pre = 24.03, post = 18.98, p < 0.01) recreation venues. The intervention appeared effective with the vacationers in recreation venues with the highest-risk for sun exposure, waterside venues. However, it was not effective throughout all the resort venues, possibly because of the sun-seeking desires of vacationers, information overload at the resorts, and constraints on clothing styles and sun protection by recreation activity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在休假期间,许多人接受与皮肤癌有关的高风险阳光暴露。户外娱乐场所(预测试N = 4347; Posttest n = 3986)在北美的温暖天气目的地度假村(n = 41)中注册了一对匹配的,组随机预测的最低限度控制准实验设计2012-14。根据运输理论和创新理论的扩散和推广先进防晒保护的印刷,视听和在线消息(例如,使用衣物,帽子,阴影和申请前/防晒剂和可靠的提示,以至于对高紫外线)进行了频道。经过培训的研究人员(即单独分析的身体覆盖率和分析和组合分数分析的身体覆盖和阴影使用)观察到度假胜地的防晒实践并没有差异(p> 0.05)或干预实施(p> 0.05)。但是,娱乐场所适度的干预措施影响。干预改善了水域休闲场所的防晒(Z-Score Composite:干预前= -22.74,Post = -15.77; Control前= -27.24,Post = -23.24)但不是非水域(Z-Score Composite:干预) pre = 20.43,post = 20.53;控制前= 22.94,post = 18.03,p <0.01)。另一种分析表明,具有更高的计划实施的度假胜地在水域的度假者中显示了阳光保护的更多改进(Z =分数复合:高实现Pre = -25.45,Post = -14.05;低实现前= -24.70,Post = -24.40)与非水域(Z-Score Composite)相比(Z-Score Composite:高实现前= 14.51,Post = 19.98;低实现前= 24.03,Post = 18.98,P <0.01)娱乐场所。干预们对娱乐场所的度假者似乎有效,具有最高风险的阳光曝光,水域场地。然而,在所有度假村的所有度假场所都没有有效,可能是因为寻求日落度假者的欲望,度假者的信息过载,以及通过娱乐活动的服装风格和太阳保护的限制。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号