...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >A systematic review on economic evaluations of school-based lifestyle interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4–12?year olds: Issues and ways forward
【24h】

A systematic review on economic evaluations of school-based lifestyle interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4–12?year olds: Issues and ways forward

机译:对校本生活方式干预的经济评估系统综述,其目标在4-12岁之间有针对性相关行为?岁月:发言和前进

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Current guidelines for economic evaluations do not provide specific recommendations for the evaluation of school-based lifestyle interventions. This study examined and discussed the key aspects in the design of economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4–12?year olds. The PubMed and CRD databases (NHS EED) were searched. Grey literature was identified from reference lists and websites of relevant organizations. Full economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting physical activity, sedentariness, or diet were selected. Key aspects included the objective, audience, intervention, comparator, population, type of analysis, perspective, costs, outcomes, and time horizon. Information was also extracted on measuring and valuing costs and outcomes, linking and extrapolating outcomes, and the maintenance of intervention effects. The 23 included studies reported on cost-effectiveness (CEAs) (N?=?12), cost-utility (CUAs) (N?=?9), social cost benefit (SCBA) (N?=?2), and social return on investment (SROI) (N?=?1) analysis.The usual practice comparator was generally not clearly defined. The SROI analysis was the single study that included outcomes in other persons than the child. Healthcare costs (N?=?14), productivity costs (N?=?4), and costs to the household (N?=?3), or education (N?=?2) sector were examined. The outcome in trial-based CEAs consisted of a variety of weight-related measures. Seven distinctive models were used to extrapolate health and/or productivity costs. To enhance the usefulness of economic evaluations on school-based lifestyle interventions in allocating public health budgets, transparent reporting on key aspects, broadening the scope of economic evaluations, and standardizing the measurement, valuation, and extrapolation of costs and outcomes should be improved.This study was conducted in Maastricht, the Netherlands.
机译:目前的经济评估指南不提供用于评估校本生活方式干预的具体建议。本研究审查并讨论了在4-12岁之间针对体重相关行为的基于学校的干预措施的经济评估设计的关键方面。搜索PUBMED和CRD数据库(NHS EED)。从相关组织的参考列表和网站中确定了灰色文学。选择了针对身体活动,庇护或饮食的校本干预措施的全面经济评估。关键方面包括客观,受众,干预,比较者,人口,分析类型,观点,成本,结果和时间范围。还提取了关于测量和重估成本和结果,连接和推断结果以及维持干预效果的信息。 23所包括的研究报告了成本效益(CEA)(N?=?12),成本效用(CUA)(N?=?9),社会成本效益(SCBA)(N?=?2)和社会投资返回(SROI)(N?=?1)分析。通常的练习比较器通常没有明确定义。 SROI分析是单一的研究,其中包括其他人的结果而不是孩子。医疗费用(N?=?14),生产力成本(n?=?4),以及家庭的成本(n?=?3),或教育(n?=?2)部门。基于审判的CEA的结果包括各种与权重措施。七种独特的模型用于外推的健康和/或生产力成本。为了提高对分配公共卫生预算的校本生活方式干预的经济评估的有用性,关于关键方面的透明报告,加宽经济评估的范围,以及标准化的计量,估值和成本和外推,应得到应变和结果。这研究在荷兰的马斯特里赫特进行了研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号