首页> 外文期刊>Primates >Comparative ecological and behavioral study of Macaca assamensis and M. mulatta in Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal
【24h】

Comparative ecological and behavioral study of Macaca assamensis and M. mulatta in Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal

机译:尼泊尔岛猕猴桃和M.Mulatta的比较生态和行为研究。尼泊尔国家公园

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Resource partitioning reduces the competition between different species within the same habitat, promoting their coexistence. To understand how such species co-adapt to reduce conflicts, we examined the behavior of two primates, Assamese macaque (Macaca assamensis) and rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), from April 2017 to March 2018 in Sivapuri Nagarjun National Park (SNNP), Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. We performed 1580 and 1261 scan sessions on wild multi-male/multi-female groups of Assamese and rhesus macaques, respectively, at 15-min sampling intervals. Assamese macaques consumed fewer plant species (38 species) than rhesus macaques (88 species). Overlapping food sources between the macaque species resulted in a Pianka index of 0.5. Assamese macaques consumed more items of tree, climber, and vine species, whereas rhesus macaques fed on more shrub, herb, and grass species. The proportions of plant parts consumed by the two species differed-more leaves, fruits and cones were used by Assamese macaques than rhesus macaques, whereas more flowers, seeds, and pods were consumed by rhesus macaques than Assamese macaques. Assamese macaques had a smaller home range (0.55 km(2)) than rhesus macaques (4.23 km(2)), and Assamese macaques had a shorter daily moving distance (1.6 km) than rhesus macaques (4.0 km). Although feeding time did not differ between the two macaque species, less time was devoted to social activities by Assamese macaques (16.0%) than by rhesus macaques (33.7%). Assamese macaques were generally arboreal, with 94.0% of their activities in trees, whereas rhesus macaques were largely terrestrial, with 58.5% of their activities on the ground. These differences in food selection, home-range size, ranging and activity patterns, and habitat use suggest that Assamese and rhesus macaques reduce resource competition through resource partitioning to coexist in a landscape matrix.
机译:资源分区减少了同一栖息地内不同物种之间的竞争,促进了他们的共存。要了解这些物种如何共同适应减少冲突,我们研究了两个灵长类动物,敏感猕猴(Macaca Assamensis)和恒河猴(Macaca Mulatta)的行为,从2017年4月到2018年3月在Sivapuri Nagarjun国家公园(SNNP),加德满都山谷,尼泊尔。我们在150分钟的采样间隔分别在野生多男/多女性群组和恒河猕猴上进行了1580年和1261次扫描会话。 assamese macaques消耗较少的植物物种(38种),而不是恒河猴(88种)。猕猴物种之间的重叠食物来源导致钢琴指数为0.5。 assamese macaques消耗了更多的树木,登山者和葡萄树种,而恒河猴喂食更多灌木,草本植物和草地。两种物种所消耗的植物部件的比例不同 - 莎拉姆猕猴比恒河猕猴使用更多的叶子,水果和锥体,而恒河猕猴也比芦荟猕猴消耗更多的花卉,种子和豆荚。 assamese macaques的家庭范围较小(0.55公里(2)),而不是恒河麦克斯克斯(4.23公里),assamese macaques每天较短,比恒河猴(4.0 km)更短的每日移动距离(1.6公里)。虽然两种猕猴之间的喂食时间没有差异,但肌肉猕猴(16.0%)的社交活动少时间(16.0%)而不是恒河猴(33.7%)。 assamese macaques通常是树栖的,患有94.0%的树木活动,而恒河猕猴在很大程度上是陆地,他们在地上有58.5%的活动。这些食物选择,家庭范围,测距和活动模式以及栖息地使用的这些差异表明assamese和恒河猴通过资源分区来减少资源竞争,以在景观矩阵中共存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号