首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric respiratory reviews >Can we trust what parents tell us? A systematic review
【24h】

Can we trust what parents tell us? A systematic review

机译:我们可以相信父母告诉我们的吗? 系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Taking a history is a key diagnostic instrument in paediatric consultations. Numerous issues potentially reduce the history's reliability. Therefore, paediatricians have always expressed ambivalence regarding history taking from parents, both valuing and distrusting it In this review, we describe how parents build and present a description of their child's health issues in the conceptual framework of self-regulation theory. We performed a systematic review on the literature on the reliability of history taking. No studies examined the reliability of history taking from parents, but there is a considerable body of evidence on the issue of mutual trust in relationships between health care professionals and patients. Because trust is a dynamic relational phenomenon, taking a patient centred approach in consultations is likely to increase the patients' and parents' trust in the health care professional, and their willingness to follow the health care professional's treatment proposals. We provide evidence based recommendations on how to build and maintain trust in paediatric consultations by taking a patient centred approach in such consultations. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:历史历史是儿科咨询的关键诊断工具。许多问题可能降低了历史的可靠性。因此,在本次审查中,儿科学生一直对父母的历史表达且尊重历史的矛盾,我们描述了父母在自我监管理论的概念框架中对其孩子的健康问题的描述。我们对历史可靠性的文献进行了系统审查。没有研究审查了父母历史的可靠性,但是有关卫生保健专业人士与患者之间关系的互信问题存在相当大的证据。由于信任是一种动态关系现象,以患者为中心的咨询方法可能会增加患者和父母对卫生保健专业人员的信任,以及他们遵守卫生保健专业人员的待遇提案。我们通过在此类磋商中采取患者以患者为中心的方法提供有关如何在儿科咨询的基于证据的建议。 (c)2017年由elestvier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号