首页> 外文期刊>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience >Trusting outgroup, but not ingroup embers, requires control: neural and behavioral evidence
【24h】

Trusting outgroup, but not ingroup embers, requires control: neural and behavioral evidence

机译:信任小组,但不是Ingroup余量,需要控制:神经和行为证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Trust and cooperation often break down across group boundaries, contributing to pernicious consequences, from polarized political structures to intractable conflict. As such, addressing such conflicts require first understanding why trust is reduced in intergroup settings. Here, we clarify the structure of intergroup trust using neuroscientific and behavioral methods. We found that trusting ingroup members produced activity in brain areas associated with reward, whereas trusting outgroup members produced activity in areas associated with top-down control. Behaviorally, time pressurewhich reduces people's ability to exert control-reduced individuals' trust in outgroup, but not ingroup members. These data suggest that the exertion of control can help recover trust in intergroup settings, offering potential avenues for reducing intergroup failures in trust and the consequences of these failures.
机译:信任与合作经常跨越集团界限,从极化的政治结构到棘手的冲突,促进了恐怖后果。 因此,解决此类冲突需要首先了解为什么信任在InterGroup设置中减少了原因。 在这里,我们使用神经科学和行为方法阐明互动信任的结构。 我们发现,信任InGroup成员在与奖励相关的大脑领域产生的活动,而信任小组成员在与自上而下控制相关的区域中产生的活动。 行为地,时间压力会降低人们在小组中施加控制减少的个人信任,而不是Ingroup成员。 这些数据表明,控制的努力可以帮助恢复对互组设置的信任,提供用于减少信任中的互动失败的潜在途径和这些故障的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号