首页> 外文期刊>Plant Disease >Evaluation of App-Embedded Disease Scales for Aiding Visual Severity Estimation of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Table Beet
【24h】

Evaluation of App-Embedded Disease Scales for Aiding Visual Severity Estimation of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Table Beet

机译:应用嵌入式疾病术视觉严重性估算表甜点的视觉严重程度评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two diagrammatic ordinal scales are available in the Estimate app (2017 version) for Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) severity on table beet: 10% linear (linear-based diagrammatic scale [LIN]) and logarithmic based (Horsfall-Barratt [HB]). These allow for estimating severity data of four types depending on the system used. A group of 30 raters assigned percentage severity on 30 photographs of diseased table beet leaves during five rounds first without an aid and then using each of the four rating systems in Estimate. In two, the perceived ordinal score of the HB or LIN scale was assigned where severity of the subject fit best. HB2 and LIN2 involved a second choice of unitary severity within the perceived score interval. There was large variation in unaided ability ofraters to estimate severity: 13% were accurate (Lin's concordance correlation [LCC] > 0.9), 23% were inaccurate (LCC < 0.7), and the remaining had moderate accuracy. Larger disparities between assigned and actual ordinal scores (mostly overestimates) occurred using the LIN compared with the HB. The LIN2 produced the most accurate estimates (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, pc = 0.96; generalized bias parameter, Ch = 0.99; Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.95) and the greatest interraterreliability (overall concordance correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.93). The two-step process using the 10% linear scale is recommended for severity estimates of CLS in table beet.
机译:在表排甜菜上的CercoSpora叶斑斑(CLS)严重性的估计应用程序(2017版)中提供了两个视图序列尺度:10%线性(基于线性的示意图[LIN])和基于对数的(Hornfall-Barratt [HB]) 。这些允许根据所使用的系统估计四种类型的严重性数据。一组30名评估者在五轮患者的患者留下的30张照片中分配了百分比严重程度,而不是援助,然后使用四个评级系统中的每一个在估计中。在二,分配了HB或LIN比例的感知序数得分,其中受试者的严重程度适合最佳。 HB2和Lin2涉及在感知分数间隔内的第二种单一严重性。综合变化的差异均衡,估计严重程度:13%是准确的(Lin的一致性相关性[LCC]> 0.9),23%是不准确的(LCC <0.7),剩余的准确性中等。与HB相比,使用LIN发生分配和实际序数分数(大多数高估)之间的较大差异。 LIN2产生了最准确的估计(LIN的一致性相关系数,PC = 0.96;广义偏置参数,CH = 0.99; Pearson的相关系数R = 0.95)和最大的不合适性系数(整体一致性相关系数和脑内相关系数> 0.93)。建议使用10%线性刻度的两步过程,用于表甜点中CLS的严重性估计。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Plant Disease》 |2019年第6期|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Departamento de Fitopatologia Universidade Federal de Vicosa Vicosa MG 36570-000 Brazil;

    Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu HI 96822 U.S.A.;

    Plant Pathology &

    Plant-Microbe Biology Section School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell AgriTech at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Cornell University Geneva NY 14456 U.S.A.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 植物保护;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号