首页> 外文期刊>Phytocoenologia >Optimizing the classification of species composition data by combining multiple objective evaluators toward selecting the best method and optimum number of clusters
【24h】

Optimizing the classification of species composition data by combining multiple objective evaluators toward selecting the best method and optimum number of clusters

机译:通过将多个客观评估者结合到选择最佳方法和最佳数量的簇来优化物种组成数据的分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: Classification is an appropriate tool for the summarizing of species data in community ecology. Researchers need to select the effective classification method(s) and the optimum number of clusters to perform a reasonable classification. The aims of the present research are to assess the efficacy of various classification algorithms and to select the optimum number of clusters. Study area: We used a dataset of 197 400 m(2) releves recorded from Tarbiat Modares University research forest located in the north of Iran. Methods: For each releve, a species list and the canopy cover were recorded by using Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale modified by van der Maarel. We considered seven classification methods: flexible-beta linkage (beta = -0.25), Ward's linkage, complete linkage, average linkage, Modified TWINSPAN, k-means, and PAM. Using each of these algorithms, data were classified into 2-21 cluster levels. Then, values of eight internal evaluators viz. ASW, 1-C.index, PARTANA, PBC, 1-ISA.pval, ISA.sig.inds, ISAMIC, 1-Morisita as well as mean lambda index were calculated for each classification level resulted from algorithms. These values were applied in three methods to select the appropriate classification algorithm(s). Also, we used those values to choose the optimum number of clusters in the selected algorithm(s). A discriminate analysis opted for the verification of the selected optimums. Results: Our results revealed that, for our data, flexible-beta linkage was the proper classification algorithm with 12 the optimum number of clusters. Despite the vast number of available classification algorithms, there is no ultimate best one for all vegetation datasets. Therefore scientists need using multiple criteria to choose their specific appropriate method. With respect to this, our methods and findings could provide a generalized framework for choosing the effective method(s) for the subsequent classification analyses.
机译:目的:分类是一个适当的工具,用于总结社区生态学中的物种数据。研究人员需要选择有效的分类方法和最佳群集数以进行合理的分类。本研究的目的是评估各种分类算法的功效并选择最佳的簇数。研究区:我们使用了197年400米(2)相关的数据集,从位于伊朗北部的Tarbiat标志性大学研究林中记录。方法:对于每个Releve,通过使用Van der Maarel修改的Braun-Blanquet覆盖丰度秤来记录物种清单和遮盖盖。我们考虑了七种分类方法:灵活性β联系(Beta = -0.25),病区的联动,完全联系,平均联动,改进的双胞胎,K型和帕姆。使用这些算法中的每一个,数据被分类为2-21个群集级别。然后,八个内部评估员viz的值。 ASW,1-C.Index,PARTANA,PBC,1-ISA.PVAL,ISA.SIG.INDS,ISAMIC,1-Morisita为每个分类水平计算算法的每个分类级别计算。以三种方法应用这些值以选择适当的分类算法。此外,我们使用这些值来选择所选算法中的最佳簇数。鉴别分析选择验证所选最优的分析。结果:我们的研究结果显示,对于我们的数据,灵活的-Beta联系是具有12个最佳群集数的适当分类算法。尽管存在广泛的可用分类算法,但对于所有植被数据集没有最佳最佳选择。因此,科学家需要使用多个标准来选择他们的具体方法。关于此,我们的方法和发现可以提供用于选择后续分类分析的有效方法的通用框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号