首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Comparative effectiveness research using electronic health records: impacts of oral antidiabetic drugs on the development of chronic kidney disease.
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness research using electronic health records: impacts of oral antidiabetic drugs on the development of chronic kidney disease.

机译:采用电子健康记录的比较效果研究:口腔防杆药物对慢性肾病发展的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Little is known about the comparative effects of common oral antidiabetic drugs ([OADs] metformin, sulfonylureas, or thiazolidinediones [THZs]) on chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and followed in community primary care practices. Electronic health records (EHRs) were used to evaluate the relationships between OAD class use and incident proteinuria and prevention of glomerular filtration rate decline.A retrospective cohort study on newly diagnosed T2D cases requiring OADs documented in the EHRs of two primary care networks between 1998 and 2009 was conducted. CKD outcomes were new-onset proteinuria and estimated GFR (eGFR) falling below 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). OAD exposures defined cohorts. Hazard ratios represent differential CKD outcome risk per year of OAD class use.A total of 798 and 977 patients qualified for proteinuria and eGFR outcome analyses, respectively. With metformin as the reference group, sulfonylurea exposure trended toward association with an increased risk of developing proteinuria ([adjusted hazard ratio; 95% CI] 1.27; 0.93, 1.74); proteinuria risk associated with THZ exposure (1.00; 0.70, 1.42) was similar to metformin. Compared with metformin, sulfonylurea exposure was associated with an increased risk of eGFR reduction to <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (1.41; 1.05, 1.91). THZ exposure (1.04; 0.71, 1.50) was not associated with change in the risk of eGFR decline.In a primary care population, metformin appeared to decrease the risk of CKD development compared with sulfonlyureas; risks of CKD development between metformin and THZs were similar. EHR use in pharmacotherapy comparative effectiveness research creates specific challenges and study limitations.
机译:关于常见口服抗糖尿病药物(α10-二甲双胍,磺酰脲类或噻唑烷基或噻唑])对慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)结果的比较效果,对新诊断为2型糖尿病(T2DM)并遵循社区原发性护理实践。电子健康记录(EHRS)用于评估OAD类使用和事件蛋白尿的关系,并预防肾小球过滤率下降。关于新诊断的T2D病例的回顾性队列研究要求在1998年间两次初级保健网络的EHR中记录的OAD。 2009年进行了。 CKD结果是新发病蛋白尿和估计的GFR(EGFR)低于60毫升/分钟/ 1.73米(2)。 OAD暴露定义了队列。危险比率为每年OAD类使用的差异CKD结果风险。分别为蛋白尿和EGFR结果分析的798例和977名患者。用二甲双胍作为参考组,磺酰脲暴露趋向于发育蛋白尿的风险增加的关联([调整后危险比; 95%Ci] 1.27; 0.93,1.74);与THz暴露相关的蛋白尿风险(1.00; 0.70,1.42)与二甲双胍相似。与二甲双胍相比,磺酰脲暴露与EGFR降低的风险增加与<60mL / min / 1.73m(2)(1.41; 1.05,1.91)相关。 THZ暴露(1.04; 0.71,1.50)与EGFR衰退风险的变化无关。在初级保健人群中,与磺脲类相比,二甲双胍似乎降低了CKD发展的风险;二甲双胍和THZ之间的CKD开发的风险相似。 EHR用于药物治疗比较有效性研究会产生具体的挑战和研究限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号