...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Deep litter removal frequency rate influences on greenhouse gas emissions from barns for beef heifers and from manure stores
【24h】

Deep litter removal frequency rate influences on greenhouse gas emissions from barns for beef heifers and from manure stores

机译:清除深层杂物的频率速率对牛犊牛舍和粪肥库产生的温室气体排放量有影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The emission of greenhouses gases (GHG) from ruminant production systems needs to be reduced. This can be achieved partly by better manure management, particularly for deep litter (DL) systems. Two contrasting removal frequency rates (1x, every 63.5 +/- 3.5 days; and 3x, every 23.1 +/- 1.5 days) were compared in a DL system for Belgian blue double-muscled heifers, focusing on CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions from the barn and during two manure storage periods, one mainly in autumn and the other mainly in winter. No significant effect (p = 0.447) of manure removal frequency on total GHG emissions was observed (1 x: 10.2 +/- 3.5; 3 x : 8.7 +/- 2.2 kg CO2 eq. kg(-1) live weight gain).The manure contributed significantly to total GHG emissions (average of 38.9 +/- 8.0% of CO2 eq.), emissions from the barn (4.0 +/- 0.7%) and manure store included (34.9 +/- 8.7%). Higher emissions (time 4.8 in CO2 eq.) from manure were observed when it was stored during the warmer period than the colder one. Large variations in emission pattern with the manure removal frequency rates were also observed, leading, potentially (not measured) to higher emissions from the 1 x treatment than the 3 x treatment for a longer storage period than the one tested in this experiment (63 +/- 1 days). Given the experimental choices, the variations in emission pattern observed indicated that mitigation options for GHG emissions from the barn and manure store related to manure removal frequency depend on manure storage duration and that keeping deep litter manure in barns without intermediate storage before spreading should be investigated. These options need to be confirmed through emission measurement during and after manure spreading in order to avoid a trade-off between emission stages. The relevance of such options in terms of agronomical concerns needs to be confirmed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:反刍动物生产系统的温室气体排放需要减少。这可以通过更好的粪便管理(尤其是对于深垫料(DL)系统)更好地实现。在DL系统中比较比利时蓝双肌肉小母牛的两个相对去除频率(1x,每63.5 +/- 3.5天; 3x,每23.1 +/- 1.5天),重点是从中排放的CO2,CH4和N2O谷仓和两个粪便储存期,一个主要在秋季,另一个主要在冬季。没有观察到粪便清除频率对温室气体总排放量的显着影响(p = 0.447)(1 x:10.2 +/- 3.5; 3 x:8.7 +/- 2.2 kg二氧化碳当量kg(-1)活体重增加)。粪便对温室气体总排放量(平均CO2当量的38.9 +/- 8.0%),谷仓的排放量(4.0 +/- 0.7%)和粪便存储量(34.9 +/- 8.7%)做出了重大贡献。当粪肥在较暖的时期储存时,比较冷的粪便排放量更高(二氧化碳当量为4.8)。还观察到排放模式随粪便清除率的变化较大,导致潜在的(未测量)导致与在本实验中测试的3x处理相比,与3x处理相比,其3x处理排放时间更长(63 + /-1天)。给定实验选择,观察到的排放模式变化表明,与粪便清除频率有关的谷仓和粪便存储温室气体排放的缓解方案取决于粪便存储持续时间,应研究在散布前在棚中保持深垫层粪肥而不进行中间存储。为了避免排放阶段之间的权衡,需要通过撒肥期间和撒肥后的排放测量来确定这些选择。需要确认这些选择在农艺方面的相关性。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号