...
首页> 外文期刊>Phlebology >The use of high venous ligation as an adjunct to endovenous therapy in the management of great saphenous vein incompetence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

The use of high venous ligation as an adjunct to endovenous therapy in the management of great saphenous vein incompetence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:使用高静脉连接作为忠诚治疗的辅助治疗巨大静脉化无能的管理:随机对照试验的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In recent years, endovenous intervention has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open venous surgery. However, endovenous intervention does not formally disconnect the deep and superficial venous systems and it is hypothesized that recurrence may be greater in the absence of high venous ligation. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a hybrid endovenous approach with adjuvant high venous ligation and standard operative intervention in the management of great saphenous incompetence. Methods In March 2018, Medline and Embase were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. All randomized controlled trials comparing a hybrid approach with standard operative intervention were included. Studies were required to include at least one pre-defined outcome. Data were extracted and assessed by two independent reviewers. Pooled risk ratios were calculated using a random effects model. Additional subgroup analyses were performed. Results Eight randomized controlled trials including 1244 patients were analysed. Pooled standardized data revealed no difference in overall recurrence (pooled RR = 1.00 [95% CI = 0.57, 1.77]), major operative morbidity (RR = 0.43 [95% CI = 0.06, 2.89]), or re-interventions (RR = 0.94 [95% CI = 0.12, 7.24]) for the hybrid group compared with standard operative intervention alone. Subgroup analysis revealed comparable short-, medium- and long-term recurrence rates between both cohorts. Furthermore, no difference in recurrence was identified when the hybrid approach was compared to open surgery alone (RR = 1.01 [95% CI = 0.63, 1.61]) or endovenous monotherapy (RR = 0.67 [95% CI = 0.04, 12.24]). Conclusion The use of a hybrid approach in the management of great saphenous incompetence appears to offer no recurrence, re-intervention or morbidity benefit when compared to standard operative intervention.
机译:背景技术近年来,恩惠干预已成为开放静脉手术的微创替代品。然而,统治干预不正常地断开深层和浅表静脉系统,并且假设在没有高静脉连接的情况下复发可能更大。本研究旨在比较杂种统治方法与佐剂高静脉结扎和标准手术干预的疗效进行比较,以管理巨大隐喻的无能。方法在2018年3月,系统地搜索了Medline和Embase相关的随机对照试验。包括与标准操作干预的混合方法进行比较的所有随机对照试验。需要研究至少包括一个预定鉴定的结果。通过两个独立审稿人提取和评估数据。使用随机效应模型计算汇总风险比。进行了额外的子组分析。结果分析了8例随机对照试验,包括1244名患者。汇总标准化数据显示总体复发没有差异(汇集RR = 1.00 [95%CI = 0.57,1.77]),主要的手术发病率(RR = 0.43 [95%CI = 0.06,2.89])或重新干预(RR =与单独的标准手术干预相比,杂交组0.94 [95%CI = 0.12,7.24])。亚组分析显示,两个群组之间的可比短期,中期和长期复发率相当。此外,当将杂合方法与单独打开手术进行比较(RR = 1.01 [95%CI = 0.63,1.61])或恩托单疗法(RR = 0.67 [95%CI = 0.04,124])时,鉴定了复发性的差异。结论与标准手术干预相比,使用杂交方法在巨大隐喻无能的管理中似乎没有复发,再干预或发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号