首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions within double rice cropping systems.
【24h】

Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions within double rice cropping systems.

机译:稻草和稻草衍生的生物炭修正对双季稻种植系统中温室气体排放的对比影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The amendment of biochar derived from crop residues to soil has been proposed as a potential mitigation strategy for tackling greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cropping systems. A field experiment was carried out to investigate GHG emissions from rice paddy fields treated with straw incorporation and straw-derived biochar amendment at various rates during two consecutive rice growing seasons in double rice cropping systems. The treatments included the following: control (no straw incorporation and no biochar amendment), low straw (rice straw incorporated at 3 t ha-1), high straw (rice straw incorporated at 6 t ha-1), low biochar (straw-derived biochar amended at 7.5 t ha-1 in 2011 and adjusted to 24 t ha-1 in 2012) and high biochar (straw-derived biochar amended at 22.5 t ha-1 in 2011 and adjusted to 48 t ha-1 in 2012). The results showed that straw incorporation significantly increased CH4 emissions relative to the control treatment, whereas biochar amendment significantly reduced CH4 emissions at the highest application rates (48 t ha-1), possibly due to a biochar-induced increase in soil pH. The seasonal cumulative CH4 emissions from the low and high straw treatments were 3.0-4.1 and 6.4-8.6 times greater, respectively, in the 2011 late rice season and 7-13 and 13-23 times greater, respectively, in the 2012 early rice season than those from both biochar treatments. In contrast, N2O emissions decreased by 26-68% in comparison with the control when straw was applied to the soil, but increased by 0.13-0.80 times in the presence of biochar, possibly due to the increased availability of NH4+ or NO3- originating from the added biochar. The seasonal cumulative N2O emissions were relatively low (15-200 g N ha-1) across all the treatments. The estimated seasonal gross global warming potentials (GWP) of CH4 plus N2O among the treatments showed a similar pattern to the seasonal cumulative CH4 emissions due to the dominance of CH4 to gross GWP (83-99% of the total). As rice straw incorporation also reduced rice grain yield, especially during the early rice season, the yield-scaled GWPs were even higher in the straw amendment treatments compared with the biochar treatments (3.2-4.0 and 7.1-8.8 times in 2011 and 9.4-13 and 18-25 times in 2012 for the low and high straw treatments, respectively). The lower gross and yield-scaled GWPs in paddy fields amended with biochar indicated that transforming straw to biochar and subsequent addition to paddy fields has potential to mitigate GHG emissions in double rice cropping systems.
机译:有人提出将作物残渣中的生物碳改良到土壤中作为解决作物系统中温室气体(GHG)排放的潜在缓解策略。进行了田间试验,研究了在双季稻种植系统中连续两个水稻生长季节,以秸秆掺入和秸秆衍生的生物炭改良剂处理过的稻田,在不同的速率下排放的温室气体。处理包括:对照(无秸秆并没有生物炭改良剂),低秸秆(3 t ha -1 掺入大米秸秆),高秸秆(6 t ha -1 ),低生物炭(秸秆生物炭在2011年修改为7.5 t ha -1 ,2012年调整为24 t ha -1 )和高生物炭(秸秆源生物炭在2011年修订为22.5 t ha -1 ,2012年调整为48 t ha -1 )。结果表明,与对照相比,秸秆还田显着增加了CH 4 的排放,而生物炭改良剂在最高施用量(48 t ha -1 ),可能是由于生物炭引起的土壤pH值升高。低秸秆处理和高秸秆处理的季节性CH 4 累积排放量分别比2011年晚稻季节高3.0-4.1倍和6.4-8.6倍,分别高7-13和13-23倍,与两种生物炭处理相比,2012早稻季节的收成分别更高。相比之下,将秸秆施用到土壤时,N 2 O排放量与对照相比减少了26-68%,但在存在生物炭的情况下增加了0.13-0.80倍,这可能是由于增加了源自添加的生物炭的NH 4 + 或NO 3 -的可用性。在所有处理中,季节累积的N 2 O排放相对较低(15-200 g N ha -1 )。处理中CH 4 加N 2 O的估计季节总全球变暖潜势(GWP)与季节累积CH 4 4 占总GWP(占总量的83-99%)的优势。由于掺入稻草还降低了稻米的产量,特别是在水稻早稻季节,与生物炭处理相比,秸秆改良剂处理的产量规模GWP甚至更高(2011年为3.2-4.0倍,而7.1-8.8倍和9.4-13倍)低和高秸秆处理分别是2012年和18-25倍)。用生物炭修正的稻田总产值和总产值较低的全球升温潜能值表明,将秸秆转化为生物炭并随后添加到稻田中有潜力减轻双季稻种植系统中的温室气体排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号