...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric dermatology >Occlusive versus neurotoxic agents for topical treatment of head lice infestation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Occlusive versus neurotoxic agents for topical treatment of head lice infestation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:闭塞性与神经毒性的局部治疗头部虱子侵扰:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Background Topical occlusive agents, such as petroleum jelly and silicone oils, kill head lice by coating and blocking its excretory system and are unlikely to induce treatment resistance. Although a popular alternative to neurotoxic pediculicides, their efficacy and safety remain unclear. Methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, HERDIN (from inception to October 31, 2017), and other relevant sources for randomized controlled trials that compared topical occlusive agents with neurotoxic pediculicides to treat patients with head lice infestation. Using Cochrane collaboration methods, we selected studies, assessed risk of bias, and pooled similar studies. We assessed certainty of evidence using GRADEPro. Results Seventeen trials (N = 2005) testing occlusive agents met inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was moderate across trials, mainly from lack of blinding of participants and personnel. As a class, occlusive agents may be more pediculicidal than neurotoxic agents (final cure rate, RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02, 1.41; 16 RCTs, N = 1779; I 2 = 88%; low certainty of evidence). Post hoc subgroup analysis suggests that this benefit may be limited to synthetic combination occlusive products. Adverse effects, such as skin and eye irritation, are similar between groups (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.36, 1.17; 15 RCTs, N = 1790; I 2 = 28%; low certainty of evidence). Conclusions In treating head louse infestation, evidence suggests occlusive agents may be superior to or equally efficacious as neurotoxic pediculicides. Adverse effects are few and minor. Future trials should use appropriate comparators and consider effects of confounders such as neurotoxin resistance. Additionally, optimal occlusive formulation and dosing regimen need to be determined.
机译:摘要背景局部闭塞剂,如石油果冻和硅油,通过涂层杀死头虱并阻止其排泄系统,并且不太可能诱导治疗抵抗力。虽然流行的神经毒性特性的替代品,但它们的疗效和安全性仍然尚不清楚。方法我们搜索中央,Medline,赫司(2017年10月31日开始),以及随机对照试验的其他相关来源,使具有神经毒性特性的局部闭塞剂与神经毒性特性进行治疗头部虱子侵扰的患者。使用Cochrane协作方法,我们选择了研究,评估了偏见的风险,并汇总了类似的研究。我们评估了使用成绩的证据确定。结果17项试验(n = 2005)测试闭塞剂符合纳入标准。偏见的风险在审判中适中,主要来自参与者和人员的盲目。作为阶级,闭塞剂可能比神经毒性剂更高(最终固化率,RR 1.20,95%CI 1.02,1.41; 16个RCT,N = 1779; I 2 = 88%;证据的肯定低)。后HOC亚组分析表明,这种益处可能仅限于合成组合闭塞产品。诸如皮肤和眼睛刺激的不良反应在组之间相似(RR 0.65,95%CI 0.36,116,15 RCT,N = 1790; I 2 = 28%;证据肯定低)。结论在治疗头部虱子侵扰中,证据表明闭塞剂可能优于或同样有效的神经毒性特性。不利影响很少和次要。未来的试验应使用适当的比较器,并考虑诸如神经毒素抗性等混淆的影响。另外,需要确定最佳的闭塞式制剂和给药方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号