...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >(Bio)fueling farm policy: the biofuels boom and the 2008 farm bill.
【24h】

(Bio)fueling farm policy: the biofuels boom and the 2008 farm bill.

机译:(生物)燃料农场政策:生物燃料的繁荣和2008年农业法案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the mid-2000s, rising gas prices, political instability, pollution, and fossil fuel depletion brought renewable domestic energy production onto the policy agenda. Biofuels, or fuels made from plant materials, came to be seen as America's hope for energy security, environmental conservation, and rural economic revitalization. Yet even as the actual environmental, economic, and energy contributions of a biofuels boom remained debatable, support for biofuels swelled and became a prominent driver of not only US energy policy but of US farm policy as well. This paper asks why biofuels became such a powerful force in farm policy debates, and draws on policy windows theory and discourse analysis to analyze biofuels' contributions to the passage of the 2008 farm bill. It finds that budgetary and political factors combined with a particular set of patriotic biofuels-oriented discourses to carry energy policy debates into farm policy. It also comments on the implications of biofuels policies for conservation and sustainable land use in 2008 and beyond.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9247-0
机译:在2000年代中期,天然气价格上涨,政治动荡,污染和化石燃料枯竭将可再生家庭能源生产纳入了政策议程。生物燃料或植物材料制成的燃料已被视为美国对能源安全,环境保护和农村经济振兴的希望。然而,尽管生物燃料热潮对环境,经济和能源的实际贡献仍然值得商,,但对生物燃料的支持却不断增加,不仅成为美国能源政策的重要推动力,而且也成为美国农业政策的重要推动力。本文提出了为什么生物燃料在农业政策辩论中为何如此强大的作用,并利用政策窗口理论和话语分析来分析生物燃料对2008年农业法案的通过做出的贡献。研究发现,预算和政治因素与特定的一系列以爱国生物燃料为导向的论述相结合,将能源政策辩论纳入了农场政策。它还评论了2008年及以后生物燃料政策对保护和可持续土地利用的影响。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9247-0

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号