首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Ideal and saturated soil fertility as bench marks in nutrient management: II. Interpretation of chemical soil tests in relation to ideal and saturated soil fertility.
【24h】

Ideal and saturated soil fertility as bench marks in nutrient management: II. Interpretation of chemical soil tests in relation to ideal and saturated soil fertility.

机译:理想和饱和土壤肥力作为养分管理的基准:II。关于理想和饱和土壤肥力的化学土壤试验的解释。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a previous paper (Part I), the ideal soil fertility and the saturated soil fertility were expressed on a relative scale, called soil fertility grade (SFG). In the current paper (Part II), the relation between SFG and soil test values is discussed. The required uptake of nutrients from the soil is translated into soil organic carbon, P-Olsen, exchangeable K, and pH (H2O) using relationships developed for a model on Quantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils (QUEFTS). Target soil test values were calculated for target yields between 2 and 10 Mg ha-1 season-1. The required uptake of soil nitrogen is a function of target yield, and it is linearly related to soil organic carbon. Results of the calculations indicate that when target yields are less than 7-8 Mg ha-1, stover must be incorporated to maintain soil organic carbon above the critical level of 6 g kg-1. When yields are below 2 Mg ha-1, also organic sources from outside the field have to be brought in. The interpretation of chemical soil test values according to the ISF-SSF framework may be rather difficult in practice, as is demonstrated with eight African soils. The major reason is that the soil supplies of N, P and K seldom are in the same proportions as in ISF-SSF. For none of the used African soils replacement input or a neutral nutrient budget would be the best management option. Replacement input will often lead to inefficient use and even waste of nutrients. Optimum soil test values depend on target yield, but the ratios of soil test values do not depend on target yield. Therefore key values were established for the ratio of soil organic carbon to P-Olsen and for the ratio of soil organic carbon to the square root of exchangeable K. Based on these key values, a new classification scheme with recommended input ratios is presented. The scheme has six classes for N and P ratios, and seven classes for N and K ratios..
机译:在先前的论文(第一部分)中,理想土壤肥力和饱和土壤肥力以相对尺度表示,称为土壤肥力等级(SFG)。在当前的论文(第二部分)中,讨论了SFG和土壤测试值之间的关系。使用为热带土壤肥力定量评估模型(QUEFTS)开发的关系,可将土壤中所需的养分吸收转化为土壤有机碳,P-Olsen,可交换的K和pH(H2O)。计算目标土壤测试值,得出目标产量在2至10 Mg ha-1 season-1之间。所需的土壤氮吸收量是目标产量的函数,并且与土壤有机碳呈线性关系。计算结果表明,当目标产量低于7-8 Mg ha-1时,必须加入秸秆以使土壤有机碳保持在6 g kg-1的临界水平以上。当产量低于2 Mg ha-1时,还必须从田间引入有机资源。根据ISF-SSF框架,化学土壤测试值的解释在实践中可能会相当困难,如八个非洲人所证明的那样。土壤。主要原因是N,P和K的土壤供应很少与ISF-SSF中相同。对于所有用过的非洲土壤,替代投入或营养中性预算都不是最佳的管理选择。替代投入通常会导致利用效率低下,甚至浪费营养。最佳土壤测试值取决于目标产量,但是土壤测试值的比率并不取决于目标产量。因此,确定了土壤有机碳与P-Olsen之比以及土壤有机碳与可交换K平方根之比的关键值。基于这些关键值,提出了一种具有推荐输入比的新分类方案。该方案对N和P比​​率有六种类别,对于N和K比率有七种类别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号