首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Systematic fast-track transition from oncological treatment to dyadic specialized palliative home care: DOMUS - a randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Systematic fast-track transition from oncological treatment to dyadic specialized palliative home care: DOMUS - a randomized clinical trial

机译:系统的快速过渡从肿瘤治疗到Dyadic专业姑息家庭护理:Domus - 一种随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The focus of specialized palliative care is to improve quality of life for patients with incurable cancer and their relatives including an increased opportunity to make their own choice of place of care and death. Aim: To investigate whether a systematic fast-track transition from oncological treatment to specialized palliative care at home for patients with incurable cancer reinforced with a psychological dyadic intervention could result in more time spent at home and death at home. Secondary aims were to investigate effects on quality of life, symptomatology and survival. Design: A prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial (: NCT01885637). Setting/participants: In all, 340 patients with incurable cancer and no or limited antineoplastic treatment options. Results: No statistically significant difference was found regarding number of deaths (4%, p = 0.460) and time spent at home (3%, p = 0.491). The secondary outcomes indicated that the intervention resulted in improved quality of life (-11.6 +/- 25.5, p = 0.005, effect size = -0.44, 95% confidence interval = -0.77; -0.11), social functioning (-15.8 +/- 31.4, p = 0.001, effect size = -0.50, 95% confidence interval = -0.84; -0.17) and emotional functioning (-9.1 +/- 21.2, p = 0.039, effect size = -0.43, 95% confidence interval = -0.76; -0.10) after 6 months. A linear mixed-effect regression model confirmed a possible effect on emotional and social functioning at 6 months. Regarding survival, no differences were found between groups (p = 0.605). No adverse effects were seen as consequence of the intervention. Conclusions: The main findings indicated that the intervention had no effect on time spent at home or place of death. However, the intervention resulted in a weak improvement of quality of life, social functioning and emotional functioning after 6 months.
机译:背景:专业姑息治疗的重点是提高患有可治区癌症及其亲属的患者的生活质量,包括增加自己选择的护理和死亡地点的机会。目的:探讨从肿瘤治疗对患者的系统快速过渡到患有心理二元干预的治疗癌症的患者,可能会在家里度过更多的时间。次要目标是调查对生活质量,症状和生存的影响。设计:预期,单中心,随机对照试验(:NCT01885637)。设定/参与者:在所有,340名患有癌症和无或有限的抗肿瘤治疗方案。结果:没有发现关于死亡人数(4%,p = 0.460)和在家中花费的时间没有统计学意义(3%,P = 0.491)。二次结果表明,干预导致了改善的寿命质量(-11.6 +/- 25.5,p = 0.005,效果大小= -0.44,95%置信区间= -0.77; -0.11),社会功能(-15.8 + / - 31.4,P = 0.001,效果大小= -0.50,95%置信区间= -0.84; -0.17)和情绪功能(-9.1 +/- 21.2,p = 0.039,效果大小= -0.43,95%置信区间= -0.76; -0.10)6个月后。线性混合效应回归模型在6个月内证实了对情绪和社会功能的可能影响。关于存活,在组之间没有发现差异(P = 0.605)。作为干预的结果没有看到不利影响。结论:主要研究结果表明,干预措施对家庭或死亡地点度过的时间没有影响。然而,干预导致了6个月后生命质量,社会功能和情绪发作的弱化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号