...
首页> 外文期刊>Parasitology Research >Performance of a new gelled nested PCR test for the diagnosis of imported malaria: Comparison with microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, and real-time PCR
【24h】

Performance of a new gelled nested PCR test for the diagnosis of imported malaria: Comparison with microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, and real-time PCR

机译:用于诊断进口疟疾的新凝胶巢式PCR试验的性能:与显微镜,快速诊断测试和实时PCR的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the techniques commonly used for malaria diagnosis but they are usually insensitive at very low levels of parasitemia. Nested PCR is commonly used as a reference technique in the diagnosis of malaria due to its high sensitivity and specificity. However, it is a cumbersome assay only available in reference centers. We evaluated a new nested PCR-based assay, BIOMALAR kit (Biotools B&M Labs, Madrid, Spain) which employs ready-to-use gelled reagents and allows the identification of the main four species of Plasmodium. Blood samples were obtained from patients with clinical suspicion of malaria. A total of 94 subjects were studied. Fifty-two (55.3 %) of them were malaria-infected subjects corresponding to 48 cases of Plasmodium falciparum, 1 Plasmodium malariae, 2 Plasmodium vivax, and 1 Plasmodium ovale. The performance of the BIOMALAR test was compared with microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) (BinaxNOW? Malaria) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The BIOMALAR test showed a sensitivity of 98.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 89.7-100), superior to microscopy (82.7 % [95 % CI, 69.7-91.8]) and RDT (94.2 % [95 % CI, 84.1-98.8]) and similar to qPCR (100 % [95 % CI, 93.2-100]). In terms of specificity, the BIOMALAR assay showed the same value as microscopy and qPCR (100 % [95 % CI, 93.2-100]). Nine subjects were submicroscopic carriers of malaria. The BIOMALAR test identified almost all of them (8/9) in comparison with RDT (6/9) and microscopy (0/9). In conclusion, the BIOMALAR is a PCR-based assay easy to use with an excellent performance and especially useful for diagnosis submicroscopic malaria.
机译:显微镜和快速诊断测试(RDT)是常用于疟疾诊断的技术,但它们通常在极低的寄生虫水平上不敏感。由于其高敏感性和特异性,嵌套的PCR通常用作诊断疟疾的参考技术。但是,它是一个繁琐的测定仅在参考中心中提供。我们评估了一种新的巢式PCR基础菌,BioMalar套件(Biotools B&M Labs,Madrid,Spain),其使用即用型凝胶化试剂,并允许鉴定四种疟原虫。从临床疑似疟疾患者获得血样。研究了94名受试者。其中五十二(55.3%)是疟疾感染的受试者,对应48例疟原虫,1例疟原虫,2个疟原虫疟疾和1个疟原虫卵子。将BioMalAL测试的性能与显微镜,快速诊断测试(RDT)(Binaxnow?疟疾)和实时定量PCR(QPCR)进行比较。 BioMalar试验显示出98.1%(95%置信区间[CI],89.7-100)的敏感性,优于显微镜检查(82.7%[95%CI,69.7-91.8])和RDT(94.2%[95%CI,84.1] -98.8])和类似于QPCR(100%[95%CI,93.2-100])。在特异性方面,BioMoMalAR测定显示与显微镜和QPCR相同的值(100%[95%CI,93.2-100])。九个受试者是疟疾的亚血管载体。与RDT(6/9)和显微镜(0/9)相比,BioMalar测试几乎所有它们(8/9)鉴定出来(8/9)。总之,BioMoMalAL是一种基于PCR的测定,易于使用优异的性能,特别适用于诊断潜在的疟疾疟疾。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Parasitology Research》 |2014年第7期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Microbiology Hospital Universitario La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III IdiPAZ Calle;

    Department of Microbiology Hospital Universitario La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III IdiPAZ Calle;

    Department of Microbiology Hospital Universitario La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III IdiPAZ Calle;

    Tropical Medicine Hospital Carlos III Madrid Spain;

    Tropical Medicine Hospital Carlos III Madrid Spain;

    Department of Microbiology Hospital Universitario La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III IdiPAZ Calle;

    Department of Microbiology Hospital Universitario La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III IdiPAZ Calle;

    Tropical Medicine Hospital Carlos III Madrid Spain;

    Department of Microbiology Hospital Universitario La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III IdiPAZ Calle;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 寄生虫病;
  • 关键词

    Diagnosis; Imported malaria; PCR; Travel medicine;

    机译:诊断;进口疟疾;PCR;旅行医学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号