首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Core Outcome Measures for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Research: Recommendations from a Veterans Health Administration Work Group
【24h】

Core Outcome Measures for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Research: Recommendations from a Veterans Health Administration Work Group

机译:慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛研究的核心结果措施:退伍军人卫生管理工作组的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) disorders are among the most prevalent and disabling conditions worldwide. It would be advantageous to have common outcome measures when comparing results across different CMSP research studies. Methods. The Veterans Health Administration appointed a work group to recommend core outcome measures for assessing pain intensity and interference as well as important secondary domains in clinical research. The work group used three streams of data to inform their recommendations: 1) literature synthesis augmented by three recently completed trials; 2) review and comparison of measures recommended by other expert groups; 3) two Delphi surveys of work group members. Results. The single-item numerical rating scale and seven-item Brief Pain Inventory interference scale emerged as the recommended measures for assessing pain intensity and interference, respectively. The secondary domains ranked most important included physical functioning and depression, followed by sleep, anxiety, and patient-reported global impression of change (PGIC). For these domains, the work group recommended the Patient-Reported Outcome Information System four-item physical function and sleep scales, the Patient Health Questionnaire two-item depression scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder two-item anxiety scale, and the single-item PGIC. Finally, a single-item National Health Interview Survey item was favored for defining chronic pain. Conclusions. Two scales comprising eight items are recommended as core outcome measures for pain intensity and interference in all studies of chronic musculoskeletal pain, and brief scales comprising 13 additional items can be added when possible to assess important secondary domains.
机译:客观的。慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMSP)障碍是全球最普遍的和禁用条件之一。在比较不同CMSP研究研究的结果时具有共同的结果措施将是有利的。方法。退伍军人健康管理局任命了一个工作组,建议评估痛风强度和干扰以及临床研究中重要的中学域。工作组使用三条数据流,以告知其建议:1)文献综合增强了三项最近完成的试验; 2)其他专家组推荐的措施的审查和比较; 3)工作组成员的两个Delphi调查。结果。单项数值额定标度和七件短暂的疼痛库存干扰量分别作为评估疼痛强度和干扰的推荐措施。中学域名的最重要包括物理功能和抑郁,其次是睡眠,焦虑和患者报告的变革的全球印象(PGIC)。对于这些域来说,工作组推荐患者报告的结果信息系统四项物理功能和睡眠尺度,患者健康调查问卷两项抑郁尺度,广义焦虑症的两项焦虑尺度,以及单项PGIC 。最后,单项国家健康面试调查项目有利于定义慢性疼痛。结论。包括八个项目的两种尺度建议作为慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的所有研究中的疼痛强度和干扰的核心结果测量,并且可以在可能时添加包含13项的短鳞片,以评估重要的二级结构域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号