首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Are migraine and tension-type headache diagnostic types or points on a severity continuum? An exploration of the latent taxometric structure of headache
【24h】

Are migraine and tension-type headache diagnostic types or points on a severity continuum? An exploration of the latent taxometric structure of headache

机译:偏头痛和张力型头痛诊断类型还是严重程度的诊断类型? 头痛潜伏税率结构的探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to assess whether migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) are best viewed as discrete entities or points on a severity continuum using taxometric analysis. Historically, classification systems have conceptualized the primary headache disorders of migraine and TTH as fundamentally different disorders that are differentiated by their characteristic symptom profiles and, as such, imply differing pathophysiologies and required treatments. Despite this categorical nosology, findings continue to emerge suggesting that migraine and TTH instead reflect dimensions of severity within the same headache construct. However, few studies have assessed this issue using taxometric statistical analyses or investigated how this taxonomic structure varies as a function of age and headache frequency. We conducted a latent-mode factor analysis of headache symptomatology obtained from 3449 individuals with headache from 2 previous, large-scale cross-sectional studies of primary headache sufferers (Martin et al., 2005, and Smitherman and Kolivas, 2013). Stratified taxometric analyses suggest that the validity of a categorical vs dimensional classification varies as a function of sample characteristics. Specifically, graphical results revealed that high headache frequency (>15 d/mo) and younger age (<24 years old) were associated with unimodal distributions suggestive of a dimensional construct of primary headache, whereas lower headache frequency and older age were associated with bimodal distributions characteristic of discrete diagnostic entities. Conceptualizing primary headache as a severity continuum was supported for young adults and those with frequent headaches. The distinctions of a categorical classification system were supported for adults (>24 years old) and those with infrequent headache.
机译:本研究的目的是评估偏头痛和张力型头痛(TTH)是否最好被视为使用税率分析的严重性连续性的离散实体或点。从历史上看,分类系统已经概括了偏头痛和TTH的主要头痛障碍,以及由其特征症状谱分化的根本不同的疾病,以及暗示不同的病理生理学和所需的治疗。尽管这种分类危害学,但结果仍然出现,表明偏头痛和Tth反映了同一头痛构建中严重程度的尺寸。然而,很少有研究通过税率统计分析评估了这个问题或调查了这种分类结构如何随着年龄和头痛频率的函数而变化。我们进行了从3449名中获得的头痛症状学的潜在模式分析,从2个以前的主要头痛患者(Martin等,2005年,2005年,2013年)。分层税率分析表明,基本VS维分类的有效性随着样本特征的函数而变化。具体地,图形结果表明,高头痛频率(> 15d / mo)和较小的年龄(<24岁)与暗示初级头痛的尺寸构建构建的单峰分布相关,而较低的头痛频率和较大的年龄与双模相关联分布离散诊断实体的特征。作为严重程度的概念性头痛,对于年轻人以及频繁头痛的人得到了支持。对成年人(> 24岁)的支持分类系统的区别以及罕见头痛的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号