...
首页> 外文期刊>Pancreatology: official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] >Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs administration is effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs administration is effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:直肠非甾体抗炎药给药对于预防ERCP后胰腺炎是有效的:随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Whether the prophylactic administration of rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) peri-ERCP is effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of rectal NSAIDs on PEP. Methods A systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Jadad score for assessing risk of bias was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. The primary endpoint of the study was efficacy for PEP prevention. Sub-analyses were performed to determine the risk reduction for different NSAID types, for general vs. high-risk patients, by timing of administration and for moderate to severe PEP. Results Twelve RCTs, including a total of 3989 patients, were identified and included in the analysis. The risk of PEP was lower in the NSAIDs group than in the placebo group (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.43–0.64; P? Conclusions A single rectal dose of NSAIDs is effective in preventing PEP both in high-risk and in unselected patients, regardless of timing of administration (pre- or post-ERCP) and NSAID type (indomethacin or diclofenac).
机译:摘要背景是急性胰腺炎是内镜逆行胆管癌(ERCP)最常见的并发症之一。预防直肠非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDS)Peri-ERCP是否有效预防ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是评估直肠NSAID在PEP上的影响。方法对文献数据库(Cochrane Library,Pubmed,Embase和Sembase和Web)进行系统搜索,以确定符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。用于评估偏见风险的Jadad评分用于评估所杂项研究的质量。研究的主要终点是PEP预防的疗效。进行次分析以确定不同NSAID类型的风险降低,对于高风险患者,通过给药时间和中度至严重的PEP。结果12条RCT,包括共3989名患者,并包括在分析中。 NSAID组的PEP的风险低于安慰剂组(RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.43-0.64; P?结论单个直肠剂量的NSAIDs在高风险和未选择的患者中有效预防PEP,无论施用的时间(或ERCP前还是后)和NSAID型(吲哚美辛或双氯氟芬)。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Organ Transplantation Center Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of;

    Department of Health Education Chengdu Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention;

    Organ Transplantation Center Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of;

    Organ Transplantation Center Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of;

    Organ Transplantation Center Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of;

    Organ Transplantation Center Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of;

    Department of Health Education Chengdu Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention;

    Department of Health Education Chengdu Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention;

    Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong;

    Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 消化系及腹部疾病;
  • 关键词

    Meta-analysis; Rectal; NSAIDs; ERCP; PEP;

    机译:荟萃分析;直肠;NSAIDS;ERCP;PEP;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号