首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Soil and water environmental effects of fertilizer-, manure-, and compost-based fertility practices in an organic vegetable cropping system
【24h】

Soil and water environmental effects of fertilizer-, manure-, and compost-based fertility practices in an organic vegetable cropping system

机译:有机蔬菜种植系统中基于肥料,肥料和堆肥的肥力做法对土壤和水环境的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Degraded soil quality, which decreases agricultural productivity and increases nonpoint source pollution of surface water, may be ameliorated by employing soil organic matter enhancing management, such as practiced by compost use in organic farming. The value of compost applied at rates lower than those required to supply crop nutrient needs requires investigation because applying compost at agronomic nitrogen rates may not be economically feasible for organic vegetable producers. We conducted field research during 2000-2002 on a Luvisol to compare the nutrient and non-nutrient effects of various rates and timings of mixed poultry litter-yard waste compost with a traditional organic fertilizer (poultry litter) and inorganic fertilizer on environmental soil attributes and water quality in an organic vegetable crop rotation. Soil organic C, total N, and available P increased 60%, 68%, and 225%, respectively, above the control with the application of 144Mghap# compost (dry wt.) during the 3-year study, but the low rate of compost (31Mghap#) did not affect soil C or N. Compost N mineralization was not synchronous with sweet corn N assimilation, resulting in excess root zone nitrate that would have posed a leaching risk without the use of a winter rye N-scavenging cover crop. The concentrations of nitrate N that leached below the tillage zone occasionally exceeded the 10mgLp# health standard but were not different among the agronomic rates of compost, poultry litter, fertilizer, and control treatments for nearly every sampling event. Despite increasing runoff water concentrations of N and P, the high compost rate reduced the amounts of N and P that were transported from the soil surface by five-fold and four-fold, respectively, compared to the inorganic fertilizer due to a four-fold reduction in runoff volume. Crop yields did not benefit from low compost rates during the 3-year duration of the study; however, improvements in some bulk density and porosity indicated that benefits of longer term, low compost rate additions may accrue over time.
机译:降低土壤质量会降低农业生产率并增加地表水的面源污染,可通过采用土壤有机质增强管理措施来改善土壤质量,例如在有机农业中使用堆肥。施用堆肥的价值低于满足农作物养分需求所需的施用量,需要进行调查,因为以有机氮肥施用堆肥对有机蔬菜生产者而言在经济上不可行。我们在2000年至2002年期间对Luvisol进行了田间研究,比较了家禽垫料场混合堆肥与传统有机肥料(家禽垫料)和无机肥料在不同速率和时间对养分和非养分的影响,以及对环境土壤特性的影响。有机蔬菜作物轮作中的水质。在为期三年的研究中,施用144Mghap#堆肥(干重)后,土壤有机碳,总氮和有效磷分别比对照增加60%,68%和225%,但相对较低。堆肥(31Mghap#)不会影响土壤C或N。堆肥N的矿化与甜玉米N的吸收不同步,导致过多的根系硝酸盐,如果不使用冬季黑麦的N覆盖农作物,则可能存在浸出风险。 。耕作区以下的硝态氮浓度偶尔超过了10mgLp#健康标准,但对于几乎每个采样事件,堆肥,家禽垫料,肥料和对照处理的农艺学分之间没有差异。尽管径流水中N和P的浓度增加,但高堆肥率使从土壤表面转运的N和P的量比无机肥料减少了五倍和四倍,这是无机肥料的四倍。减少径流量。在研究的三年期间,低堆肥率并未使作物产量受益;但是,堆密度和孔隙率的改善表明,随着时间的推移,可能会增加长期,低堆肥率的好处。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号