...
首页> 外文期刊>Sleep medicine reviews >The impact of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on objective sleep parameters: A meta-analysis and systematic review
【24h】

The impact of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on objective sleep parameters: A meta-analysis and systematic review

机译:认知行为治疗对失眠症对客观睡眠参数的影响:META分析和系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is well-established that cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) improves self-reported sleep disturbance, however the impact on objective sleep is less clear. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the impact of multi-component CBT-I on objective measures of sleep, indexed via polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. Following appraisal for risk of bias, extracted data were meta-analysed using random-effects models. The quality of the literature was generally high, although reporting of methodological detail varied markedly between studies. Meta-analyses found no evidence that CBT-I reliably improves PSG-defined sleep parameters. Actigraphy evidence was more mixed; with a small effect for reduction in sleep onset latency (Hedge's g = -0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.51 to -0.05], p = 0.018) and a moderate effect for reduction in total sleep time (TST) (Hedge's g = -0.51 [95% CI -0.75 to -0.26], p < 0.001). In contrast, and consistent with recent meta-analyses, CBT-I was associated with robust improvements in diary measures of sleep initiation and maintenance (Hedge's g range = 0.50 to 0.79) but not TST. While the literature is small and still developing, the sleep benefits of CBT-I are more clearly expressed in the subjective versus objective domain. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:众所周知,对失眠的认知行为治疗(CBT-I)改善了自我报告的睡眠障碍,但对客观睡眠的影响不太清楚。这种荟萃分析旨在量化多组分CBT-i对睡眠客观措施的影响,通过多核酸(PSG)和Atighaphy索引。十五项研究符合纳入标准。在评估偏差风险之后,使用随机效果模型进行提取的数据进行了荟萃分析。文献的质量通常很高,尽管研究在研究之间有明显多种多样的方法。 Meta-Analys发现没有证据表明CBT-I可靠地改善了PSG定义的睡眠参数。激光证据更加混合;对于睡眠起始潜伏期的效果很小(对冲的G = -0.28 [95%置信区间(CI)-0.51至-0.05],p = 0.018)和对总睡眠时间(TST)的减少的中等效果(对冲G = -0.51 [95%CI -0.75至-0.26],p <0.001)。相比之下,与最近的Meta分析一致,CBT-I与睡眠启动和维护的日记措施(对冲G范围= 0.50至0.79)的鲁棒性改进相关,但不是TST。虽然文献很小,但仍在开发,但在主观与客观领域中更清楚地表达了CBT-I的睡眠优势。 (c)2019年由elestvier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号