...
首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >A pragmatic comparative study of palliative care clinician's reports of the degree of shadowing visible on plain abdominal radiographs
【24h】

A pragmatic comparative study of palliative care clinician's reports of the degree of shadowing visible on plain abdominal radiographs

机译:姑息治疗临床医师普通腹部X线术视域淋浴术语的务实比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The assessment of constipation symptoms is based on history and physical examination. However, the experience is highly subjective perhaps explaining why palliative medicine doctors continue to use plain abdominal radiographs as part of routine assessment of constipation. Previous studies have demonstrated poor agreement between clinicians with this work in palliative care, limited further by disparity of clinicians' experience and training. The aim of this work was to explore whether there was less variation in the assessments of faecal shadowing made by more experienced clinicians compared to their less experienced colleagues. This pragmatic study was conducted across six palliative care services in Sydney (NSW, Australia). Doctors of varying clinical experience were asked to independently report their opinions of the amount of shadowing seen on 10 plain abdominal radiographs all taken from cancer patients who self-identified themselves as constipated. There were 46 doctors of varying clinical experience who participated including qualified specialists, doctors in specialist training and lastly, doctors in their second- and third post-graduate years. Poor agreement was seen between the faecal shadowing scores allocated by doctors of similar experience and training (Fleiss's kappa (FK): RMO 0.05; registrar 0.06; specialist 0.11). Further, when the levels of agreement between groups were considered, no statistically significant differences were observed. Although the doctors did not agree on the appearance of the film, the majority felt they were able to extrapolate patients' experiences from the radiograph's appearance. As it remains challenging in palliative care to objectively assess and diagnose constipation by history and imaging, uniform and objective assessment and diagnostic criteria are required. It is likely that any agreed criteria will include a combination of imaging and history. The results suggest the use of radiographs alone to diagnose and assess constipation in palliative care represents low value care.
机译:便秘症状的评估是基于历史和体检。然而,这种经验是非常主观的,也许是解释为什么姑息医学医生继续使用平原腹部射线照相作为便秘进行常规评估的一部分。以前的研究表明,临床医生之间的协议在姑息治疗中,临床医生经验和培训的差异进一步有限。这项工作的目的是探讨粪便在经验丰富的临床医生的粪便阴影评估方面是否存在较小的变化。这项务实的研究是在悉尼(南威尔州,澳大利亚)的六个姑息治疗服务中进行的。改变临床经验的医生被要求独立地报告他们对10种普通腹部射线照相所见的阴影量的看法,这些胃肠瘤中所有从癌症患者那里被自我识别为便秘。有46名医生不同的临床经验,他们参加了包括合格的专家,专业培训的医生,最后,医生在其第二次和第三次毕业生年。由类似经验和培训的医生分配的粪便阴影分数之间看到了糟糕的协议(Fleiss的Kappa(FK):RMO 0.05;注册商0.06;专家0.11)。此外,当考虑群体之间的协议水平时,没有观察到统计学上显着的差异。虽然医生不同意这部电影的外观,但大多数人都认为他们能够从射线照片的外表外推动患者的经验。由于它仍然持痛苦的痛苦,以客观地评估和诊断历史和诊断便秘,需要统一和客观评估和诊断标准。任何商定的标准可能都包括成像和历史的组合。结果表明,单独使用射线照相诊断和评估姑息治疗中的便秘代表低价值护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号