首页> 外文期刊>Sports medicine >Will the Conscious-Subconscious Pacing Quagmire Help Elucidate the Mechanisms of Self-Paced Exercise? New Opportunities in Dual Process Theory and Process Tracing Methods
【24h】

Will the Conscious-Subconscious Pacing Quagmire Help Elucidate the Mechanisms of Self-Paced Exercise? New Opportunities in Dual Process Theory and Process Tracing Methods

机译:有意识的潜意识的沼泽泥潭是否有助于阐明自我节奏运动的机制? 双程理论的新机遇和过程追踪方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The extent to which athletic pacing decisions are made consciously or subconsciously is a prevailing issue. In this article we discuss why the one-dimensional conscioussubconscious debate that has reigned in the pacing literature has suppressed our understanding of the multidimensional processes that occur in pacing decisions. How do we make our decisions in real-life competitive situations? What information do we use and how do we respond to opponents? These are questions that need to be explored and better understood, using smartly designed experiments. The paper provides clarity about key conscious, preconscious, subconscious and unconscious concepts, terms that have previously been used in conflicting and confusing ways. The potential of dual process theory in articulating multidimensional aspects of intuitive and deliberative decision-making processes is discussed in the context of athletic pacing along with associated process-tracing research methods. In attempting to refine pacing models and improve training strategies and psychological skills for athletes, the dualprocess framework could be used to gain a clearer understanding of (1) the situational conditions for which either intuitive or deliberative decisions are optimal; (2) how intuitive and deliberative decisions are biased by things such as perception, emotion and experience; and (3) the underlying cognitive mechanisms such as memory, attention allocation, problem solving and hypothetical thought.
机译:运动起搏决策的程度是有意识或下意识地进行的,是一个盛行的问题。在本文中,我们讨论为什么在起搏文献中统治的一维意识辩论抑制了我们对起搏决策中发生的多维过程的理解。我们如何在现实竞争态势中做出决定?我们使用哪些信息以及我们如何回应对手?这些是使用巧妙设计的实验需要探索和更好地了解的问题。本文提供了关于重点意识,前焦,潜意识和无意识的概念的清晰度,以前用于冲突和混乱的方式。在运动起步的背景下讨论了在运动起搏的背景下讨论了在阐述了直观和审议决策过程的多维方面的潜力,以及相关的过程跟踪研究方法。在试图改进起搏模型并改善运动员的培训策略和心理技能方面,可以用来更清楚地了解(1)直观或审议决策是最佳的情况的理解; (2)感知,情感和经验等事物偏离的直观和审议决定; (3)潜在的认知机制,如记忆,关注分配,解决问题和假设思想。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sports medicine》 |2017年第7期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Essex Sch Biol Sci Sport Performance &

    Fatigue Res Unit Colchester CO4 3SQ Essex England;

    Univ Essex Ctr Psychoanalyt Studies Colchester CO4 3SQ Essex England;

    Indiana Univ Dept Kinesiol Bloomington IN 47405 USA;

    Univ Essex Sch Biol Sci Sport Performance &

    Fatigue Res Unit Colchester CO4 3SQ Essex England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 运动医学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 05:47:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号