...
首页> 外文期刊>AgraFood East Europe >Power and accuracy of QTL detection: simulation studies of one-QTL models.
【24h】

Power and accuracy of QTL detection: simulation studies of one-QTL models.

机译:QTL检测的功能和准确性:一个QTL模型的仿真研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Non-parametric selective resampling procedures were used to investigate the effect of several factors on the power of quantitive trait loci (QTL) detection, the bias and confidence intervals of their position, effect and heritability. The factors studied were population size, QTL position, heritability of the QTL and marker coverage, i.e., marker density and their regular versus random spacing. Confidence intervals obtained using either Normal approximation, the bias corrected and accelerated (BCa)method and empirical bootstrap with 1000 selected resamples were compared. The BCa intervals were found to be very close to classic confidence intervals (CI) assuming normal distribution for sample sizes above 200, and to be slightly closer to empiricalCI for small population sizes. The precision of the QTL position was found to be mostly affected by population size and heritability, and less by marker spacing, except in the case of sparse maps with irregular marker spacing. Bias in QTL position estimates can be high for small population sizes when QTL are located near the end of a chromosome, and, unexpectedly, selective bootstrap does not decrease this bias very much.
机译:使用非参数选择性重采样程序来研究几个因素对定量性状基因座(QTL)检测能力,其位置,效应和遗传力的偏倚和置信区间的影响。研究的因素是种群大小,QTL位置,QTL的遗传力和标记覆盖率,即标记密度及其规则间隔与随机间隔。比较使用正态近似,偏倚校正和加速(BCa)方法以及经验自举法与1000个选定的重采样获得的置信区间。假设样本数量大于200的情况呈正态分布,则发现BCa区间非常接近经典置信区间(CI),而对于小样本量,BCa区间则稍微接近经验CI。发现QTL位置的精度主要受群体大小和遗传力的影响,而不受标记间隔的影响较小,除非稀疏地图的标记间隔不规则。当QTL位于染色体末端附近时,对于较小的种群大小,QTL位置估计中的偏差可能会很高,而且,出乎意料的是,选择性引导程序不会大大降低这种偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号