...
首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Efficacy of levetiracetam for reducing rolandic discharges in comparison with carbamazepine and valproate sodium in rolandic epilepsy
【24h】

Efficacy of levetiracetam for reducing rolandic discharges in comparison with carbamazepine and valproate sodium in rolandic epilepsy

机译:Levetiracetam在罗兰西癫痫中减少罗兰血肽和丙酮钠钠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeThe main purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) with the older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for preventing atypical evolution in children with Rolandic epilepsy (RE). Accordingly, the present study compared the efficacy of older AEDs (carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate sodium (VPA)) with LEV in reducing rolandic discharges (RDs) on interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) in children with RE. MethodsPatients in this heterogenous study were subdivided into CBZ, VPA and LEV groups in accordance with the initial monotherapy. The CBZ and VPA groups were studied retrospectively, but the LEV group was studied prospectively. Appearances of discharges were counted and these rates were computed. In comparison with the baseline RD frequency, EEG response to AED treatment was classified such as complete disappearance and response (≥50% reduction in RD frequency). The time taken to attain complete disappearance or response in EEG responders was assessed for each AED treatment group. ResultsResponders comprised 10 (11.2%) of the 89 patients treated with CBZ, 41 (56.2%) of the 73 patients with VPA, and 25 (71.4%) of the 35 patients with LEV. Mean interval to achievement of EEG response in the CBZ, VPA, and LEV groups were 36.3, 23.1, and 14.7 months, respectively. EEG response was achieved significantly more rapidly with LEV than with CBZ (p?
机译:本研究的主要目的是将Levetiracetam(Lev)与较旧的抗癫痫药物(AED)的疗效进行比较,用于预防罗兰癫痫(RE)的儿童中的非典型演变。因此,本研究比较了较旧的AEDs(CARBAMAZEPINE(CBZ)和戊酸酯钠(VPA)的功效与RE RE的儿童闭合脑电图(EEG)上的罗兰菌排放(RDS)的疗效进行了比较。根据初始单一疗法将该异质研究中的方法分类为CBZ,VPA和LEV组。回顾性地研究CBZ和VPA组,但前瞻性地研究了LEV组。计数放电的外观,计算这些速率。与基线RD频率相比,对AED治疗的EEG反应被分类,例如完全消失和响应(RD频率≥50%)。对每组AED治疗组评估eEG响应者彻底消失或反应所需的时间。结果应包含10例(11.2%)的89例患者,其中73例VPA患者的CBZ,41例(56.2%),以及35例患者的25例(71.4%)。 CBZ,VPA和LEV组在CBZ,VPA和LEV组中实现EEG反应的平均间隔分别为36.3,23.1和14.7个月。 eEG反应与Lem比CBZ(p≤0.001)或VPA(p?<0.005)显着达到急响应。在所有3种调查药物中,癫痫发作控制并没有显着差异。结局似乎似乎优于CBZ和VPA,其能够抑制RE的儿童RDS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号