首页> 外文期刊>Science and Technology for the Built Environment >Comparison of ASHRAE peak cooling load calculation methods
【24h】

Comparison of ASHRAE peak cooling load calculation methods

机译:ASHRAE峰冷却负荷计算方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The building peak cooling load calculation is one of the fundamental steps to develop a proper whole-building HVAC system design. The accuracy of the calculation not only impacts the system size but also influences the building's performance over the long run since oversized or undersized HVAC systems can exhibit less than optimal operation. Therefore, an accurate, easy-to-use method has been a goal for more than 60 years in the United States. To date, ASHRAE has published five methods for determining building peak cooling loads, including the total equivalent temperature difference/time averaging (TETD/TA) method, the transfer function method (TFM), the cooling load temperature difference/solar cooling load/cooling load factor (CLTD/SCL/CLF) method, the heat balance method (HBM), and the radiant time series method (RTSM). This article presents the results of a comprehensive comparison of these building peak cooling load calculation methods with a focus on the sensible building envelope cooling loads. The results show that the HBM is the most accurate method, followed by the RTSM, the TFM, the TETD/TA method, and the CLTD/SCL/CLF method.
机译:建筑峰值冷却负荷计算是开发适当的全建筑HVAC系统设计的基本步骤之一。计算的准确性不仅影响系统尺寸,而且影响建筑物的性能在长期运行中,因为超大或尺寸的HVAC系统可以表现出不到最佳操作。因此,准确,易于使用的方法在美国超过60年的目标是目标。迄今为止,Ashrae已发布五种用于确定建筑峰冷却负载的方法,包括总等效温差/时间平均(TETD / TA)方法,传递功能法(TFM),冷却负载温度差/太阳能冷却负载/冷却负载因子(CLTD / SCL / CLF)方法,热平衡法(HBM)和辐射时间序列方法(RTSM)。本文介绍了这些建筑峰冷却负载计算方法的全面比较,重点是可明智的建筑包络冷却负荷。结果表明,HBM是最准确的方法,其次是RTSM,TFM,TETD / TA方法和CLTD / SCL / CLF方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号