...
首页> 外文期刊>Otology and neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology >Evaluation of Insertion Forces and Cochlea Trauma Following Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion
【24h】

Evaluation of Insertion Forces and Cochlea Trauma Following Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion

机译:机器人辅助耳蜗植入电极阵列插入后的插入力和耳蜗创伤的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hypothesis:The objective was to evaluate the effect of cochlear implant (CI) insertion technique on electrode insertion forces and intracochlear trauma. We hypothesize that robotics-assisted insertions will reduce insertion forces and intracochlear trauma compared with manual insertions.Background:Variability in CI outcomes exists across patients, implant centers, surgeons, and electrode types. While surgical techniques that reduce electrode insertion trauma are well established, insertion trauma remains one contributing factor to variability in CI outcomes. Previous work demonstrates that micromechanically controlled insertion tools reduce both maximum insertion forces and insertion variability compared with manual insertions.Methods:CI electrode insertions were performed either by hand (n=12) or utilizing a robotics-assisted tool (n=12) in fresh frozen, human cadaveric cochleae using electrodes from four different CI manufacturers. Electrodes array insertion forces were additionally evaluated in benchtop cochlea models. Following cadaveric insertions, samples were imaged via high resolution x-ray microscopy to evaluate electrode position and intracochlear trauma events based on a modified Eshraghi scale.Results:Electrode array insertions performed by robotics-assisted system showed significantly lower insertion forces and variability. Manual electrode array insertions had a significantly higher overall trauma score of 3.12.0 compared with 0.9 +/- 1.0 for robotics-assisted insertions. Robotics-assisted insertions had higher rate of basilar membrane elevations while manual insertions showed higher rates of severe trauma events.Conclusions:The robotic-assisted insertion system reduced trauma events associated with CI electrode insertions in cadaveric cochleae compared with manual insertions. Surgical devices which help to precisely and more consistently insert electrodes may improve CI outcomes and hearing preservation.
机译:假设:目的是评估耳蜗植入物(CI)插入技术对电极插入力和胰蛋白卷曲创伤的影响。我们假设机器人辅助插入将减少与手动插入的插入力和Intracochlear创伤。背景:患者,植入中心,外科医生和电极类型存在CI结果的可变性。虽然降低电极插入创伤的手术技术已经确定,但插入创伤仍然是CI结果的可变异的一种因子。以前的工作表明,与手动插入相比,微机械控制的插入工具减少了最大插入力和插入可变性。方法:CI电极插入用手(n = 12),或利用新鲜的机器人辅助工具(n = 12)进行新鲜使用来自四种不同CI制造商的电极冷冻,人尸体耳蜗。在Benchtop Cochlea模型中另外评估电极阵列插入力。在尸体插入之后,通过高分辨率X射线显微镜进行样品,以基于改进的eShraghi秤评估电极位置和intacochlear创伤事件。结果:由机器人辅助系统执行的电极阵列插入显着降低插入力和可变性。手动电极阵列插入的整个创伤总量比为3.12.0的总体创伤得分显着更高,而有关机器人辅助插入的0.9 +/- 1.0。机器人辅助插入具有更高的基底膜升高率,而手动插入显示出更高的严重创伤事件率较高。结论:与手动插入相比,机器人辅助插入系统减少了与Ci电极插入中的Ci电极插入相关的创伤事件。有助于精确且更始终插入电极的外科器件可以改善CI结果和听力保存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号