...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Bridging the gap between culture and safety in a critical care context: The role of work debate spaces
【24h】

Bridging the gap between culture and safety in a critical care context: The role of work debate spaces

机译:在关键护理背景下弥合文化与安全之间的差距:工作辩论空间的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

From the beginning, studies on reliability and safety have highlighted the crucial role of organizational culture. However, culture, context and groups of individuals are highly intertwined, making the culture difficult to manipulate and steer. Like Hopkins (2019), this study considers that taking only a "hearts and minds" approach to safety is ineffective without appropriate organizational structures. An interesting research avenue is therefore to understand the relationship between organizational structure and culture over time. This research took the form of an ethnographic study carried out in a French critical care unit to examine how structural spaces - in the form of "work debate spaces" - can connect safe medical practices and organizational culture. The study shed light on two types of work debate spaces: formal and informal spaces. These inter-related work debate spaces enable a more refined approach to understanding the relationship between structure and culture.
机译:从一开始,关于可靠性和安全性的研究突出了组织文化的关键作用。 但是,个人的文化,情境和群体具有高度交织的,使文化难以操纵和转向。 像霍普金斯(2019年)一样,本研究认为,在没有适当的组织结构的情况下,仅仅采取“心灵和思想”的安全方法是无效的。 因此,一个有趣的研究大道是为了了解组织结构与随着时间的推移的关系。 这项研究采用了法国关键护理单位中进行的民族图表的形式来检查结构空间如何 - 以“工作辩论空间”的形式 - 可以连接安全的医疗实践和组织文化。 这项研究揭示了两种类型的工作辩论空间:正式和非正式空间。 这些与相关的工作辩论空间有一种更加精致的方法来了解结构和文化之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号