首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >An extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system
【24h】

An extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system

机译:模糊开发的故障模式和效果分析(FDFMEA)对飞机着陆系统的延伸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is an obvious fact that a significant number of accidents happening each year are due to the failure of aircraft systems' components. To manage this risk, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), a well-known method, is employed for reliability analysis in the mentioned fields. Three elements; Severity (S), Detection (D) and Occurrence (O) are considered in typical FMEA to calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN) for concentrating on the risks and taking corrective actions. The significant numbers of shortcoming which have mentioned in literature can be faced to crisp RPN computation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to extend FMEA by considering a group decision-making under the fuzzy environment. In fact, the present study was designed to contribute both theoretically and practically contributes to aircraft landing system as one of the important potential failure mode in aerospace industry. In an engineer standpoint the comparison of results between the conventional FMEA and Fuzzy Developed FMEA (FDFMEA) suggests that the risky failure modes accompanied with FDFMEA yield a more reliable result. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这是一个明显的事实,即每年发生的大量发生事故是由于飞机系统的成分失败。为了管理这种风险,失败模式和效果分析(FMEA),一种众所周知的方法,用于提到的领域的可靠性分析。三个要素;严重程度,检测(D)和出现(O)被认为是典型的FMEA,以计算集中风险并采取纠正措施的风险优先级(RPN)。文学中提到的大量缺点可以面对酥脆的RPN计算。因此,本研究的目的是通过考虑模糊环境下的群体决策来延长FMEA。事实上,本研究旨在理论上贡献,实际上贡献飞机着陆系统作为航空航天行业的重要潜在故障模式之一。在工程师中,传统FMEA和模糊开发的FMEA(FDFMEA)之间的结果比较表明,伴随着FDFMEA的风险失效模式产生了更可靠的结果。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号