首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >How important are tariffs and nontariff barriers in international markets for fresh fruit?
【24h】

How important are tariffs and nontariff barriers in international markets for fresh fruit?

机译:在国际市场上,新鲜水果的关税和非关税壁垒有多重要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

International markets for agricultural products are often subject to a range of trade barriers, and horticultural products are no exception. This article examines the economic implications of tariffs and sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) regulations that are applied to global markets for fresh apples and fresh oranges. We calculate regional-level tariff rates and ad valorem equivalents for SPS barriers following the price-wedge approach. A simulation model is developed and used to assess the price, quantity, and welfare implications of reducing tariffs, removing SPS barriers, and removing SPS barriers that have been identified as a Specific Trade Concern (STC) by the World Trade Organization. Results suggest that a 36% reduction in global tariffs would lead to greater welfare gains than would the elimination of SPS measures in apple markets. However, in orange markets, we find that SPS measures have much larger economic implications for producers and consumers. Here, a 36% reduction in tariffs would lead to smaller overall welfare effects compared to removal of all SPS measures, and only slightly larger effects than those from removal of STCs alone. copyright 2011 International Association of Agricultural Economists.
机译:农产品的国际市场经常受到一系列贸易壁垒的限制,园艺产品也不例外。本文研究了适用于全球新鲜苹果和桔子市场的关税以及卫生与植物检疫(SPS)法规对经济的影响。我们采用价格楔形法计算了SPS壁垒的区域级关税税率和等价物。开发了一个仿真模型,用于评估降低关税,消除SPS壁垒和消除SPS壁垒对价格,数量和福利的影响,这些已被世界贸易组织确定为特殊贸易关注点(STC)。结果表明,与取消苹果市场上的SPS措施相比,全球关税降低36%可以带来更大的福利收益。但是,在橙色市场中,我们发现SPS措施对生产者和消费者的经济影响更大。在此,与取消所有SPS措施相比,关税降低36%会导致总体福利影响较小,并且其影响仅比仅取消STC造成的影响大一点。版权所有2011国际农业经济学家协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号