...
首页> 外文期刊>Orbit >Assessment of lacrimal resistance using a manometric tear duct irrigation system
【24h】

Assessment of lacrimal resistance using a manometric tear duct irrigation system

机译:使用锻体撕开管道灌溉系统评估曲面抗性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lacrimal surgery aims to provide a low-resistance tear drainage passage. An assessment of lacrimal resistance guides decisions on surgery. We present results of a modified tear duct irrigation system that reliably measures lacrimal outflow resistance. Patients in a specialist lacrimal clinic had a full work-up to the point of tear duct syringing. The tear ducts were irrigated using a manometric system, which applied a fixed, known head of fluid pressure to a lacrimal cannula. Fluid flow is recorded and the lacrimal resistance derived as fluid pressure/fluid flow (units cmH20 secml-1, for simplicity presented as drops per minute, dpm). Patient groups were: A: Asymptomatic, A1: subgroup where the fellow symptomatic eye had a visible cause for watering, B: external visible cause for watering (ocular surface/lid/punctum), C: no externally visible cause, D: post op DCR, E: post syringing and probing, F: mixed/other. 444 tear ducts were examined. Mean flows (dpm) were: A1 (n = 19) 55; B (n = 183) 46; C (n = 142) 22: D (n = 38) 52. Excluding complete obstruction (n = 29), tear duct syringing only detected 48% of those with impaired manometric flow. Of those with a normal tear duct syringing, 53% had impaired manometric flow; 34% had a flow of 0 dpm. Differences in A1 versus C; B versus C and pre versus post dacryocystorhinostomy were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). The manometric system presented reliably measures lacrimal resistance and provides a substantial increase in sensitivity and specificity over conventional lacrimal syringing.
机译:泪手术旨在提供低阻撕裂引流通道。对手术的曲曲线导向指导的评估。我们提供了一种可靠地衡量泪流流出抗性的改良撕开管灌系统的结果。专家泪水诊所的患者完全达到了撕开管道的点。使用测量系统灌溉撕开管道,该系统施加固定的,已知的流体压力头部到泪珠的套管。记录流体流动并衍生为流体压力/流体流动(单位CMH20SECML-1的曲曲线电阻,简化为每分钟下降,DPM)。患者群体是:A:无症状,A1:亚组,其症状眼睛具有可见的浇水原因,B:浇水的外部可见原因(眼表面/盖子/尾声),C:没有外部可见的原因,D:POST OP DCR,E:后排和探测,F:混合/其他。检查了444次撕开管道。平均流量(DPM)是:A1(n = 19)55; b(n = 183)46; C(n = 142)22:d(n = 38)52.不包括完全梗阻(n = 29),撕开管道注射只检测到肌内流动受损的48%。在常规撕开管道调节的那些中,53%的体力测量流量受损; 34%的流量为0 dpm。 A1与C的差异; b与c雌激蛋白酶术后术语(p <0.05)。测量系统可靠地测量泪珠的抗性,并在常规的泪管上提供敏感性和特异性的显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号