...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncoimmunology. >Association of baseline systemic corticosteroid use with overall survival and time to next treatment in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in real-world US oncology practice for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, or urothelial carcinoma
【24h】

Association of baseline systemic corticosteroid use with overall survival and time to next treatment in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in real-world US oncology practice for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, or urothelial carcinoma

机译:基线系统皮质类固醇与整体生存和时间与下一次治疗的关联,接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的现实世界美国肿瘤治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌,黑素瘤或尿路上皮癌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have expanded treatment options for patients with solid tumors. Systemic corticosteroids (CSs) have an indispensable role in cancer care, but CS-related immunosuppression may counteract the CPI-driven antitumor immune response. This retrospective study investigated the association between baseline CS use (bCS; d14 days before, d30 days after CPI initiation) and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), melanoma (aMel), or urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We analyzed data from the Flatiron Health electronic health recordderived de-identified database for adults diagnosed with aNSCLC, aMel, or aUC between January 2011 and June 2017 who received e1 CPI monotherapy in any treatment line. Associations of bCS use with overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics (i.e., ECOG performance status, site of metastases). In total, 2,213 patients were diagnosed with aNSCLC (n = 862), aMel (n = 742), or aUC (n = 609) and received e1 CPI administration. Most patients (67%-95%) received CSs, many during the baseline period (19%-30%). Patients with bCS use had shorter median OS than those with no bCS use for aNSCLC (6.6 vs 10.6 months; P= .00018), aMel (16.4 vs 21.5; P= .095), and aUC (4.1 vs 7.7; P= .0012). bCS use was associated with shorter OS (not significant for aMel) and TTNT in adjusted multivariable analyses, and clinical outcomes were not explained by prior CS use or other measured confounders. These findings suggest a potential association between bCS use and decreased CPI effectiveness, warranting further investigation. ?2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
机译:免疫检查点抑制剂(CPI)对实体肿瘤患者进行了扩展的治疗选择。全身皮质类固醇(CSS)在癌症护理中具有不可或缺的作用,但CS相关免疫抑制可以抵消CPI驱动的抗肿瘤免疫应答。该回顾性研究研究了基线CS使用(BCS; D14天,CPI初始后的D30天,D30天)与晚期非小细胞肺癌(ANSCLC),黑素瘤(AMEL)或尿路上皮癌(AUC)的临床结果之间的关联和临床结果(AUC )。我们分析了Flatiron Health电子健康录制的数据,用于诊断出患有ANSCLC,AMEL或AUC的成人的DE-INTERADIOND数据库,2017年6月在任何治疗线中获得E1 CPI单药治疗。使用多变量的Cox比例危险模型调整人口统计学和临床​​特征的多变量的Cox比例危险模型,估计BCS与整体存活(OS)和时间(TTNT)的关联进行估算总共有2,213名患者被诊断为ANSCLC(N = 862),AMEL(n = 742)或AUC(n = 609)并获得E1 CPI施用。大多数患者(67%-95%)收到CSS,在基线期间许多(19%-30%)。 BCS使用的患者的中位数均比没有BCS用于ANSCLC(6.6与10.6个月; P = .00018),AMEL(16.4 Vs 21.5; P = .095)和AUC(4.1 VS 7.7; P =。 0012)。 BCS使用与较短的OS(AMEL不显着)和TTNT在调整后的多变量分析中有关,并且未通过先前的CS使用或其他测量混淆解释临床结果。这些调查结果表明,BCS使用和降低CPI有效性之间的潜在关联,需要进一步调查。 ?2020作者。泰勒和弗朗西斯集团,LLC发布牌照。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号