首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Effects of in-situ and reanalysis climate data on estimation of cropland gross primary production using the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model
【24h】

Effects of in-situ and reanalysis climate data on estimation of cropland gross primary production using the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model

机译:利用植被光合作用模型原位和再分析气候数据对农田总初级生产力估算的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Satellite-based Production Efficiency Models (PEMs) often require meteorological reanalysis data such as the North America Regional Reanalysis (NAAR) by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) as model inputs to simulate Gross Primary Production (GPP) at regional and global scales. This study first evaluated the accuracies of air temperature (T-NARR) and downward shortwave radiation (R-NARR) of the NARR by comparing with in-situ meteorological measurements at 37 AmeriFlux non-crop eddy flux sites, then used one PEM - the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM) to simulate 8-day mean GPP (GPP(VPM)) at seven AmeriFlux crop sites, and investigated the uncertainties in GPP(VPM) from climate inputs as compared with eddy covariance-based GPP (GPP(EC)). Results showed that TNARR agreed well with in-situ measurements; RNARR, however, was positively biased. An empirical linear correction was applied to RNARR, and significantly reduced the relative error of RNARR by similar to 25% for crop site-years. Overall, GPP(VPM) calculated from the in-situ (GPP(VPM(EC))), original (GPP(VPM(NARR))) and adjusted NARR (GPP(VPM(adjNARR))) climate data tracked the seasonality of GPP(EC) well, albeit with different degrees of biases. GPP(VPM(EC)) showed a good match with GPP(EC) for maize (Zea mays L), but was slightly under-estimated for soybean (Glycine max L.). Replacing the in-situ climate data with the NARR resulted in a significant overestimation of GPP(VPM(NARR)) (18.4/29.6% for irrigated/rainfed maize and 12.7/12.5% for irrigated/rainfed soybean). GPP(VPM(adjNARR)) showed a good agreement with GPP(VPM(EC)) for both crops due to the reduction in the bias of R-NARR. The results imply that the bias of R-NARR introduced significant uncertainties into the PEM-based GPP estimates, suggesting that more accurate surface radiation datasets are needed to estimate primary production of terrestrial ecosystems at regional and global scales. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:基于卫星的生产效率模型(PEM)通常需要气象重新分析数据,例如国家环境预测中心(NCEP)提供的北美区域再分析(NAAR)作为模型输入,以模拟区域和全球范围内的初级生产总值(GPP) 。这项研究首先通过与37个AmeriFlux非作物涡流通量站点的现场气象测量结果进行比较,评估了NARR的气温(T-NARR)和向下短波辐射(R-NARR)的准确性,然后使用一个PEM-植被光合作用模型(VPM),可模拟七个AmeriFlux作物产地的8天平均GPP(GPP(VPM)),并与基于涡度协方差的GPP(GPP(EC))相比,研究了气候输入中GPP(VPM)的不确定性)。结果表明,TNARR与现场测量结果吻合良好。但是,RNARR呈正偏见。对RNARR进行了经验线性校正,对于作物种植年,RNARR的相对误差显着降低了约25%。总体而言,从原位(GPP(VPM(EC))),原始(GPP(VPM(NARR)))和调整后的NARR(GPP(VPM(adjNARR)))气候数据计算得出的GPP(VPM)跟踪了GPP(EC)很好,尽管存在不同程度的偏差。 GPP(VPM(EC))对玉米(Zea mays L)与GPP(EC)表现出很好的匹配,但对大豆(Glycine max L.)则被低估了。用NARR取代原地气候数据会导致GPP(VPM(NARR))的高估(灌溉/暴雨玉米为18.4 / 29.6%,灌溉/暴雨大豆为12.7 / 12.5%)。 GPP(VPM(adjNARR))与GPP(VPM(EC))对于两种农作物均表现出良好的一致性,这是因为R-NARR的偏差减少了。结果表明,R-NARR的偏差在基于PEM的GPP估计中引入了显着的不确定性,表明需要更准确的表面辐射数据集来估计区域和全球范围内陆地生态系统的主要产量。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号