...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Chest compression-only versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of medical origin: A propensity score-matched cohort from 143,500 patients
【24h】

Chest compression-only versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of medical origin: A propensity score-matched cohort from 143,500 patients

机译:胸部压缩与常规心肺复苏的旁观者目睹医院医院外逮捕:倾向于143,500名患者的倾向匹配队列

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines do not define the optimal type of CPR (chest compression-only CPR [CCCPR] or conventional CPR with rescue breathing [CCRB]) to be performed by bystanders when they witness someone collapse.
机译:背景:目前的心肺复苏(CPR)指南未定义最佳类型的CPR(仅限胸部压缩CPR [CCCPR]或常规CPR,通过旁观者在证人崩溃时进行旁路呼吸呼吸[CCRB])。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号