...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Prognostic impact of the conversion to a shockable rhythm from a non-shockable rhythm for patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
【24h】

Prognostic impact of the conversion to a shockable rhythm from a non-shockable rhythm for patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

机译:对患有医院外心脏骤停的患者的不可震动节律,转化对令人震动节律的预后影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: For patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), having an initial shockable rhythm is a marker of good prognosis. It has been suggested as one of the main prognosticating factors for the selection of patients for extracorporeal resuscitation (E-CPR). However, the prognostic implication of converting from a non-shockable to a shockable rhythm, as compared to having an initial shockable rhythm, remains uncertain, especially among patients that can otherwise be considered eligible for E-CPR. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the nitial rhythm and its subsequent conversion and survival following an OHCA, for the general population and for E-CPR candidates. Methods: This study used a registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada. Adult patients suffering from a non-traumatic OHCA for whom the initial rhythm was known were included. The association between the initial rhythm and its subsequent conversion or not and survival to discharge was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 6681 included patients, 1788 (27%) had an initial shockable rhythm, 1749 (26%) had pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and no subsequent shockable rhythm, 295 (4%) had PEA and a subsequent shockable rhythm, 2694 (40%) had asystole and no subsequent shockable rhythm, and 155 (2%) asystole and a subsequent shockable rhythm. As compared to patients having an initial shockable rhythm, patients in all other groups had significantly lower odds of survival to hospital discharge (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Univariate analyses were performed for E-CPR candidates. Among these 556 (8%) patients, more patients with an initial shockable rhythm survived than patients in all other groups (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Conclusions: The initial rhythm remains a much better prognostic marker than subsequent rhythms for all patients suffering from an OHCA, including in the subset of potential E-CPR candidates.
机译:目的:对于患有医院外的心脏骤停(OHCA)的患者,具有初始令人震动的节奏是一种良好预后的标志。已被建议作为选择体外复苏患者的主要预测因素之一(E-CPR)。然而,与具有初始震动节律相比,从不可触扰节律转换的预后意义仍然不确定,特别是在否则认为有资格获得E-CPR的患者中的患者。本研究的目的是评估纽约节律和随后在OHCA后的随后转换和生存之间的关联,以便普遍存存和E-CPR候选人。方法:本研究采用加拿大蒙特利尔的OHCA注册表。包括患有初始节律所知的非创伤OHCA的成年患者。使用多变量的逻辑回归评估初始节律和其随后转换与其随后转换和放电的存活之间的关联。结果:6681岁患者,1788名(27%)具有初始震动节奏,1749名(26%)具有无紫外线电活动(豌豆),无需随后的可震动节奏,295(4%)具有豌豆和随后的可震动节奏,2694 (40%)具有asystole,无需随后的可震动节奏,155(2%)asystole和随后的可震性节律。与初始令人震动节奏的患者相比,所有其他组的患者对医院放电的生存率显着降低了(所有比较的P <0.001)。对E-CPR候选进行单变量分析。其中556名(8%)患者中,更多患者初始令人震动的节奏幸存,而不是所有其他群体的患者(所有比较的P <0.001)。结论:初始节律仍然比后续节律仍然是患有OHCA的所有患者的后续节律,包括在潜在的E-CPR候选者的子集中。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号